Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
#202221#
比较沉闷的影片，却能令人感知中年困境的真实状况，为一种真实的传递给4⭐
城导，你还是多拍点情色片吧，这种类型的片子不适合你。
无趣 所以现在精神疾病还是这些俗烂编剧常用设定呗 但既然用这个设定就麻烦去了解相关基础知识 不是跟这瞎用 都多少年了还在精神病和神经病混用 这tm是一回事嘛？何况还是出自精神科医生之口 乱七八糟
覺得好似用微單拍完的，導演完全不懂得用兩個演技出色的演員，不做任何有效的鋪陳就讓演員在長鏡頭飆演技，看到一頭霧水完全找不到共情點，可惜陳湘琪一身好功夫
看之前觉得这种设定应该很有趣，没想到居然能拍的这么无趣！
三星半吧，我觉得拍得还是挺细腻的，而且有紧有松，节奏不惹人讨厌。有意思的事，搜这个电影的中文名在豆瓣电影词条里是找不到的，只能搜英文的。不知道这个词又哪里敏感了。
太蠢了，像在饭局上像听那些自以为有趣的社会人在聊天，
古屋兔丸的原作+脚本，成定秀夫监督，本以为会是个如《性之剧毒》版充满猎奇X性X恶趣味X变态的「终极杀器」，结果呈现效果却出奇的差。Autassassinophilia是个极具爆炸力与挑战性的议题，但导演在表现方式上却过分注重于行为而脱离了对于心理因素的探究。且近期成定秀夫的选角一直是个谜，如今的田中圭已经「油腻」到不忍直视，却还一而再再而三的饰演人设很帅的「万人迷」角色着实违和。总结起来是要猎奇没猎奇，要表演没表演，要深度没深度，故弄玄虚，平庸之作。
陈湘琪和黄柔闽都演得有点好，让人有点害怕。
就像是用力挠你痒痒让你笑一样... 无聊到可怕，可能是对于男女主都有一些好感所以就更忍不了这种烂片了，剧情也是乱七八糟，真的很无语哈。
只能用猎奇来看这部片，为何日本这个土壤可以孕育出这么多奇葩的性癖呢。出漫画居然还能有人砸钱拍真人版，饭圈是有多大！三观尽毁
男人靠出轨，女人靠灵修，在婚姻这场修行中，他们变得空洞无物。
修行，从来不是去寻找依赖；
这么屌的故事估计一般的导演都拍不好，最后眼镜妹那段哭戏也算是教科书级别的烂了
剧情单薄，演员表现不错，创意十足，要是能有所延展就更好了。中秋唯一选中的电影，老少咸宜。
年轻的时候不会看这类题材，但是应该去了解知道的
故事讲明白了，元素较多题材不多见，很日本的片子
里面的演员真的好不错啊，男主女主，还有一众出现的配角，都能看得出他们在很用心在呈现自己的角色。看完补了一下花絮觉得他们在戏外的相处场面也很好玩。
2.5。影人本身比作品更精彩。時隔七年，錢翔還是執著於拍攝50+女性的生命、生活與困局（前作是打不開的門，本作是被鎖上的露台），只是這回更沉潛到婚姻的命題，更簡化為人物的一連串狀態。似乎和《迴光奏鳴曲》是同一個家的場景。極度靜謐的氛圍下被放大的細瑣環境音。導演提到把缽想像成嘆氣蠻有趣。有一些若有似無的sign，如鳥等。尾聲的浴缸戲似乎推不太到，還好有鬆手。攝影還是喜歡走景深。（211113）
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
