Sixty Glorious Years is an exercise in the creation of iconography, both for Victoria and its star, Anna Neagle (who subsequently became known as 'Regal Neagle'). Just as Elizabeth I commissioned artists to create flattering iconic images for public consumption, so this film performs a similar function, for Neagle is more beautiful than the real life Victoria. Controversial events (such as the 'Irish problem') are omitted and unpleasant aspects of Victoria's character (her petulance, arrogance, favouritism and 'right to privilege') are glossed over as endearing little 'whims'. Albert acts as a moderating influence when she goes too far.
The film followed a year after the highly successful Victoria the Great (d. Herbert Wilcox, 1937). Again the screenplay is by Miles Malleson and Robert Vansittart, and many of the supporting cast (the cream of acting talent of period) repeat their roles, this time for the colour cameras. This was the first full length Technicolor film of cinematographer Freddie Young, who captures the spectacle of royal weddings, grand balls and opulent interiors, with scenes actually filmed at royal palaces. Vivid battle scenes, set in Alexander Korda's empire territory (Sevastopol and the Sudan), rival those in The Four Feathers (d. Zoltan Korda 1939).
The title music sets the tone: a regal choir sings over a shot of the crown. Elgar's 1901 'Pomp and Circumstance' march is heard during the diamond jubilee celebrations and, as Victoria's coffin lies in state, the film concludes with Anthony Collins' stately music accompanied by the text of Rudyard Kipling's 'Lest we forget'. Combined with the emotional appeal of scenes of Victoria connecting with her 'ordinary folk', this is stirring stuff.
The film connects with contemporary events of 1938. The release of two celebratory royal films was intended to boost public affection for the monarchy in the wake of Edward VIII's abdication. Anglo-German relations were another touchy subject. With another war on the horizon, influential voices wanted appeasement, and the film could be seen to fit that agenda. Victoria herself was of mainly German descent, nicknamed 'the grandmother of Europe', while Albert is a 'good German', charmingly played by Anton Walbrook as a cultured, decent man.
Sixty Glorious Years now seems unduly formal and reverential. Had movies existed during Victoria's reign (they only emerged at the end) this might have been the kind of film produced. Unlike Mrs Brown (d. John Madden, 1997), it is all so very 'Victorian'.
Roger Philip Mellor
剧组是不是把我当傻逼，最后还要用萤火虫前后呼应，生怕我看不懂，气得出门马上要点根烟平静下
PlanB是黑暗版，PlanC是光明版。希望悲剧都只存在于剧本中，都未曾真实发生。
作为商业电影有比较吸引人的结构，但是和误杀没有啥关系。整体故事的表达对平凡人来说也过于悲剧了
1】本片投资最少也有几千万吧，为啥一点质感都没有呢，后期没钱调色？
1、不知道说《雄狮少年》乳华的人们会不会认可本片(陈思诚)辱泰的一贯作风
嗯 全世界无产阶级联合起来😶
看到最后我总感觉这个情节似曾相识，但是又想不出来
其实整体感觉还不错，但是有许多转折和逻辑不合理的地方，强行扭的那种，可惜了
因为之前在B站看到很多吐槽这部电影的up主，可能给了我足够的心理准备，反而看完之后，没有觉得那么糟糕。 肖央还是有演技的，他给我的感觉不尬，但是剧本有点拉胯。那个女记者有点不太行，我第一反应是她这是被硬塞进去的吧。任达华在这部剧里，有点水土不服，也说不出来哪里怪，但就是觉得和整部剧的调性不符。 印象最深的是医生拿着没有心脏的箱子，就那么阴森森的看着那个昏迷的孩子，真的太恐怖了，更令人恐惧的是这种“勾结”，你知道它并非虚构。 羊只要能好好的吃草，才不会管是谁在薅他们身上的毛呢。羊只要能好好活着，只要能活着，被薅点羊毛又算点什么呢。虽然剧情和第一部不相关，但是从这个角度看，这两部又有相通之处。
跟1比起来，2简直是坨狗屎，情节突兀，人设立不住，最最关键的是感动点特别生硬、尬的要死
优缺点都明显。救孩子这个最连通观众的情感点很扎实。贫富不公阶级固化变成架空环境商业片的卖座之道这事儿本身有点魔幻，但也恰因为真正想要针砭时弊的文艺片及报告文学都被堵死了才得以让此类商业片“聪明”地产生了。没有那么真实的集体情绪出口是不是出口呢？观众判断。但就这一部中间的一些情节硬伤比如手术室的电话铃声可以听到让瞬间我已经有点不关心主题的那部分了。
剧情就禁不起推敲，但肖央的感情很真挚。其他人物角色就跟玩似的，围观群众的人物群像刻画也挺刻意的但有时候真的这样，喊打喊杀的是你们，10分钟后喊英雄欢呼的还是你们
讲阶级，讲贫富差距，讲社会问题，左翼评论家们怎么看？好不好？悬不悬？浮不浮？
虽是翻拍，但整体上来说，故事的完整性、构思性强，反转也不错。
我是看完误杀2才想起来1我曾经看过，没有把两部的风格对上，怎么说呢，我觉得2不至于说很难看，何谓误杀也算是有几重含义。总体来说，可能换个片名会更好。
泰国人心真大，这都给拍。买卖器官这事现在还多吗？220203//
悬疑推理元素合格，从亲情和人性的角度来看，其实是一部很不错的剧情片。为人父母的人似乎更能理解肖央的角色和他为孩子奋不顾身、殊死一搏的决心。《误杀2》的背景话题底色依然是沉重的，阶级和医疗问题的痛点，弱势群体追求公平的艰辛，都让人在心酸中有所思考。无论如何，都还是要相信这个世界的微光，像萤火虫一样。
故事不合理，内涵不深刻。泰国？: ) 有点无奈，有点可爱。
高层可以掠夺别人孩子的医疗资源给自己孩子续命，底层只能牺牲和消耗自己的生命，哺育和供给下一代，人类历史残酷地演进。
妻子很出戏 女记者也是 最容易被煽动的是群众
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
