You are never fully liberated from Auschwitz, 11 July 2016 Author: Red-125 from Upstate New York The French movie "À la vie" was shown in the U.S. with the translated title "To Life (2014)." It was written and directed by Jean-Jacques Zilbermann. The film is a Post-Holocaust saga, although it opens with scenes in Auschwitz that are truly horrific. Hélène (Julie Depardieu) and Lily (Johanna ter Steege) were friends in Auschwitz, and they managed to survive the death march from Auschwitz to Louslau together. A third friend, Rose (Suzanne Clément) was unable to walk, so they were forced to leave her behind. As it turned out, Rose survived until the liberation of Auschwitz. The three did not see each other again until 1962, when they come together for a reunion at a beachside resort in Northern France. We learn early in the movie that Lily divorced her husband after the war, and is living as a "free soul," with no permanent partner. Hélène and Rose both married concentration camp survivors. The plot of the film--based on the lives of three actual friends--revolves around their interactions during the reunion. No matter how much ice cream they eat, and how they display their new bathing suits, thoughts keep circling back to Auschwitz. They quarrel about tiny details which they remember differently. They revive horrible memories. It's clear that the reunion will change their lives, but whether the change will be for the better or for the worse is an open question. For reasons I don't understand, "To Life" caries a terrible IMDb rating of 6.1. Fortunately, we saw it as part of the excellent Rochester Jewish Film Festival. If we hadn't had "All-Event" tickets, we probably would have stayed home. This is a movie to be seen, not missed. Ignore the rating and seek it out. It's available on DVD, and it will work well on the small screen. See it!
对原型的家庭分崩戏期待值过高 结果拍出来依旧比中邪高明不到哪去 虫子符咒鬼上身 与观众联动等恐怖元素的堆叠也并无新意 时间线混乱 亲情的文戏拖沓又俗套 厌烦的情绪冲淡了恐怖观感 对不起导演我看的盗版又差评不要诅咒我
太失望了，好好的片子让伪纪录片形式给毁了，请问导演要如何解释：在无第三人在场的情况下，非主角摄像机且不是监控视角的第三视角镜头？为了追求代入感而采用伪纪录片手法，但基本的视听原理都抛弃了，如何能让人入戏？求求各位恐怖片导演当自己的技术做不到逻辑统一的时候，还是用最原始的手法拍片吧！在我看来真正做到内外统一的伪纪录片只有《第九区》。
基本上就是把以往的伪纪录恐怖片学了个遍。小孩都还算自然，可惜大人们演技一个比一个差，仿佛时刻提醒观众她们正在用力地演戏，作为想要以真实感来吓人的伪纪录片，叫人怎么看。
像极了早年间网络上疯传的恶意诅咒邮件，制作组真是充满了恶意。给我点赞，诅咒自动反弹给制作组！
PS：害怕也就算了，居然还有人觉得晦气啥的，看到这群把电影当真的，我居然有点理解广电的存在，建议《走近科学》一起复播吧，破除封建迷信不能停。。。
两天前煮饭把大米撒了满桌满地 清理了好久弄的到处都是 看完这个片子突然感觉这大米是我的守护神帮我撒的吧……
和女儿一起看的第一个恐怖片，最后拉入观众的设计还是可以的。
#归来吧，远行人
要不是特效很假太过出戏还是能够带入氛围的。但是《死画像》的邦子明显比这个高级多了。
毫无新意，演员的表演，尤其是女主演，真的太差了。不是因为它比其它华语恐怖片好，它就值得高分，把《咒》放到所有恐怖片里，它就是部及格片，再加上它咒观众一点，2星最多了。
not bad但也不足以吸引人看到结束。阿东好像东出昌大
我觉得是最近几年看过最好看的恐怖片，值得满分，给未来的恐怖片提供了一个新思路，就是沉浸式观影，玩弄了一把观众后让观众冷汗直冒。看完之后感觉我需要去看新闻联播缓解一下我受伤的心灵
这个片子之所以看后让人反感，就是因为给观众下降头，就像小时候看机器猫中的一集里野比收到了不幸的信一样，而这种打破第四面墙的手法我个人很不喜欢，类似的片子还有《趣味游戏》，和我对那个电影的评价一样，只有毫无职业操守的导演，才会以戏虐观众为乐。
很难相信2022年了，在全球最大的流媒体平台上看到的热门新片居然是这样一部低成本粗制滥造的三无伪纪录片，连底蕴都要靠提两嘴彩云之南。最后cos盲僧更是全片最蚌埠住的画面。网飞赞助的不错，下次别赞了。
感觉很混乱，并不是因为非线性叙述手法，而是一些情节设计缺乏逻辑性。例如女儿从阳台跳下，回来时手里拿着刀，然后走到房间看录像，这些有什么意义？一些元素也无法解释，邪灵的作用到底是催眠还是附身？被诅咒的人有死得快的，也有慢的……这整个就像编剧硬是把七零八碎、毫无关联的东西堆在一块，让人感觉莫名其妙。
我觉得之前那几版预告片更有趣些
当初看《灵异咒》就觉得漫长地难以忍受，这部《咒》两个小时，它内里民俗恐怖最邪气的部分已经被稀释殆尽，并且这一定是要导演和剪辑来背锅。伪纪录这种形式看着粗糙，实际上对素材的编排处理要求更高，这方面肯定比不上《中邪》，也比不上《灵媒》。
抛开恐怖（恶心）的部分不说，内核尽然还挺温情的…
到底是想要伪记录真实还是要叙事营造还是想要搞出meta性质伪记录 压根都没想明白那整片散掉也毫不意外了
宣传的挺好，概念不错，但是挺失望的。情节太破碎了，一味的添加恐怖元素，反而乱七八糟。前半段还挺感人的，知道他们是自己送死的，就离谱了，后期还走传销路线。。。哎！视觉恐怖太多了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
