Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
就章子怡那段还可以。沈腾那段，我唯一看到的，就是深圳的孩子太卷了。
章子怡让人刮目相看，另外你说这特么都能穿越时空了，还不能防水是不是有点扯淡
倒不是多精彩，只是完成度比较高，徐峥对这种题材掌控还是挺轻松的，寓教于乐本身就很接地气，时间线也更和现在的观众贴近，整个看下来最顺滑的一部。
原来可以这么直接地在银幕上照搬另一位导演的风格而无自己的创作特色 更可悲地大概是这一段还是四段里面唯一能看的//如果要讲父母子女之间的传承 那么这都讲了些什么 简直毫无意义
看了一个视频，有人说是这部电影，看完才发现，我踏马被骗了。吴京这个硬煽情，没啥意思。章子怡这个更无聊，直接快进。徐峥这个还行，沈腾这个也只是一般。这电影真的很无聊，太主旋律了。
如果只有第二个故事，满分！
告诉你山川大河
只看了后三个，依然是徐峥《鸭先知》最有巧思。第一支广告和迷影情怀结合，镜头语言致敬韦斯安德森，单独四星。《诗》主要是情感细腻，剪辑非常凌乱。失望于腾妹《少年行》，不好笑且剧情老套。每段的结尾都很生硬。另外哪里有王菲呀？知道啦，原来是《如愿》。
徐峥鸭先知一段挺有意思，能看出点新意和心意，其他几段太凑合了，像央视公益广告。
天边的月 心中的念
走你所走的长路
前两个还可以，后两个emmm,还好没去电影院
大年初四看得，第一单元，儿死了……第二单元，爹死了……怎么说呢，中央六请不要过年的时候放这个了吧
倒不是多精彩，只是完成度比较高，徐峥对这种题材掌控还是挺轻松的，寓教于乐本身就很接地气，时间线也更和现在的观众贴近，整个看下来最顺滑的一部。
乘风，吴京一如既往的用力过猛；诗，章子怡让人眼前一亮，通篇眼含热泪，致敬我们的父辈，他们不为人知的奋斗过、燃烧过、热爱过；一个父与子精忠报国视死如归，一个两代人默默奋斗甘作中国航天奠基石，关于中国第一支广告片的鸭先知显然接不住这么厚重的前戏，徐峥稍显平庸且和前两个故事形成明显的撕裂感；本来沈腾马丽有望一锤定音，可是少年行却意外翻车，这次的压轴戏比我和我的家乡中相差甚远，包袱抖不响立意空洞乏味，全程尴尬不断直接拉低了整片水准。
时间够长，每个故事讲的还可以，就是风格有点乱，一次性看完有点分裂
我的父亲，他既不是抗日将士，也是科学伟人，更不是商业大亨。我的父亲，他就是百万人群中，勤勤恳恳头顶天脚踩地的农民。我对这部电影，毫无感觉父辈的身影。
《鸭先知》太有意思了，抓住韦斯·安德森对称构图和叙事风格精髓，充满谐趣。徐峥作品一直是《祖国》三部曲最佳，一部比一部好，拍短片实在有一套。《诗》第二好，不过也太悲了。《乘风》和《少年行》都一般。本片在《祖国》三部曲里年代跨度最大，从20世纪40年代到21世纪50年代横跨100年，让本就拼凑的四个故事愈发割裂，希望这个系列别再有下一部了。
《我和我的__》走到第三年，迎来系列最佳作。四位中生代国民明星演兼导。在各自单元最大发挥了自己的优势。吴京《乘风》战马动作戏英勇飒爽。章子怡《诗》则柔情滋润。徐峥绘声绘色讲温情阳光的市民故事。沈腾前卫融科幻进喜剧。感动父辈负重，激励敢争人先，传承接力更美好的一代。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
