剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 月彩 2小时前 :

    邓布利多他说,“你知道他已经没救了,但至少他可以救我们啊。”

  • 郜海亦 4小时前 :

    2.8 绥靖政策下一路风光的格林特勒遭遇直播事故,克雷登史密斯突然上台居然不是为了扇耳光。就是说谁都特么不要随便对神奇宠物进行无害化处理,动物的事情处理不好会出很大的问题,尤其是舆论上的问题,网民的眼睛是雪亮的。镜子里公然展示”GV”,镜子外都是琼瑶言情剧,音乐一起都有点故意卖腐了。真以为会正经拍点政治惊悚的德式谍战类型片?在这个躺平时代不存在的,就像这假普选,所呈现的都是些空空的魔法奇观和不讲逻辑、过目就忘的全息作秀短视频罢了。

  • 龙潍 1小时前 :

    果然,世界要是没有昂撒为首美国人将要太平的多

  • 波以轩 8小时前 :

    有点太梦幻美好了,真实的代孕比这要残酷不公的多,多少天真的女孩像米米一样在对代孕一知半解的情况下把身体交出去,获得的报酬却完全与承担的风险不对等,但她们却没有米米身边支持她的人,那对美国夫妇算是典型的买方了,自私无情,只把孩子看成商品,目前代孕合法最大的问题是无法保证代孕母亲的权益,在这条产业链她们付出最多但地位最低,而这部电影完全没有触及代孕产业的深层,把一个现实题材拍的过于肤浅。

  • 谌雁芙 3小时前 :

    孩子没有缺陷,有缺陷的是不顾别人自私自利的心。

  • 礼阳伯 4小时前 :

    8分。非常好看的印度片。代孕的各方面矛盾都轻松搞笑的展现了,唯一不足可能就是结尾太理想化了,但这是大家喜闻乐见的。女主很漂亮。

  • 祁楚骁 2小时前 :

    淡雅的画面,看着太舒服了,这才是真正的舞者,很有气质,难得的探案好剧

  • 莲敏 5小时前 :

    代孕问题,发达国家与发展中国家,白人与黄人,佛教与穆斯林,最后的和解有些突兀。

  • 类慧颖 7小时前 :

    代孕题材的电影,表达的主题也比较深刻,Kriti女神演技爆棚。另外这部电影可以给郑爽看一下。

  • 祁金理 3小时前 :

    代孕是个道德伦理冲突点颇多的题材,笑泪混杂,非常适合徐峥来拍

  • 路灵寒 4小时前 :

    半点自我反省的意识都没有🙃

  • 祁子继 4小时前 :

    结尾给稍微进入新思路。不然全篇又臭又长,没营养。

  • 邴初南 1小时前 :

    如果每次都惊艳于印度电影的题材 那本身就是一种偏见

  • 滑莎莉 1小时前 :

    宝莱坞在世界电影工业中是有安身立命绝活的,拿四星不难比如摔跤吧爸爸之类,靠的是流畅的叙事能力和接地气生动的表演,这种套路有单一局限性,没有欧洲电影或者东亚电影那么多的艺术样式,但是印度套路做到极致也可以达到五星,比如本片。几度反转都在意料之外情理之中,人情味与故事主题的探讨深入都让片子变得出色。

  • 靳德润 0小时前 :

    咪咪好不容易 所以说代孕真的很坏又自私专门骗这些身体健康但是又无知的女孩子

  • 繁宛凝 5小时前 :

    及格的。但是大反派居然追求民主程序上位,笑死。

  • 正萱 3小时前 :

    宝莱坞在世界电影工业中是有安身立命绝活的,拿四星不难比如摔跤吧爸爸之类,靠的是流畅的叙事能力和接地气生动的表演,这种套路有单一局限性,没有欧洲电影或者东亚电影那么多的艺术样式,但是印度套路做到极致也可以达到五星,比如本片。几度反转都在意料之外情理之中,人情味与故事主题的探讨深入都让片子变得出色。

  • 暨海颖 0小时前 :

    看网上喷的不行极其恐慌,但还挺好看的~毕竟这个系列叫神奇动物在哪里,ggad磕也磕了,虽然很想念德普,神奇动物质量也在线,纽特又跳舞~而且一直在给hp结结实实的填坑🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️ 🦂️🕺🕺

  • 祁思宁 0小时前 :

    老头乐很好,麦子叔比前任强800倍,虽然剧情稀烂但是不妨碍我狠狠嗑到。GGAD作为hp宇宙的唯一真男同,privilege已经尽数体现了🥺

  • 璐淑 3小时前 :

    差点三观就立不住了,幸好演员演技在线,结局用大爱无疆圆满了。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved