Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
烂剧本 烂桥段 烂角色 甚至会尬到 布拉德皮特就这样gg了 更不能忍了 强烈建议2倍速以上
这不是个探险片啊，哎，勉强算是吧，爱情探险好了
其实可以算三星半。皮特笑死我，很合适！！中间剖析过去的地方，竟然还让我有点感动，现代小鸡片已经不是“万能”男主拯救女主了，是一起努力活下去了吗，倒也是蛮好的hhhh
轻喜剧的套路, 几度让我笑出声的桥段, 迷人的主角, 皮特精彩的客串, this movie simply works.
本来就够扯了，布拉德皮特还尼玛又复活了~桑德拉布洛克也是神，快六十的人了，看着也就三十多，科技改变容颜吧。
这是一部女性向的屎尿屁电影，查宁卖肉皮特耍帅，反派太没存在感了
没头脑和不高兴设定。难看到要死。一个小时弃。
真的不太好笑，迷失之城和宝藏部分又如此缺乏想象力，正反派都没有魅力，唯一好看的也就是那个屁股了
64年的女主，和80年的男主去丛林探险，最后吻上了。
探险不像探险，爱情不像爱情，打斗追逐又不够刺激。
其实可以算三星半。皮特笑死我，很合适！！中间剖析过去的地方，竟然还让我有点感动，现代小鸡片已经不是“万能”男主拯救女主了，是一起努力活下去了吗，倒也是蛮好的hhhh
三星都给皮特的头，给皮特长着长发的头，给皮特甩着长发的头，给皮特被爆的头。
最大亮点竟然是借女性视角对男性body shame、刻板印象以此反讽男性？！
烂剧本 烂桥段 烂角色 甚至会尬到 布拉德皮特就这样gg了 更不能忍了 强烈建议2倍速以上
Entertaining! Brad Pitt is so handsome !
虚幻的小说成为现实，停摆的生活高速翻转。昨日还在失爱的追忆中沉溺，转眼便在险恶的山林处逃窜。失落的遗址留下秘语，传说的瑰宝藏匿深处。没有璀璨华丽的珠宝，只有思念成疾的呼唤。远离尘嚣也不愿诀别，一个个贝壳书写出动人的爱情。腰缠万贯也抵不过你的陪伴，我愿永眠于你的身畔。传说与现实的互文，原来我也一直忽略了我生命中的瑰宝，只需要一个吻就能重生，撕碎过去便能成为更好的自己……
逗比男主，在线露腚。演员阵容强大，可惜剧情太差，让人失望的冒险故事。
反正后面我玩手机去了.这2人是不是都打针去了？钱老板看上去特别不自然
几小时前才刚重温 第六感生死缘 立马就看到了打酱油版brad 差距之大难以适应2412
中规中矩的冒险喜剧。完成了我的期待，但没有惊喜那种，可能是俩人对手戏的火花不够吧。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
