Exploring the role and symbolic meaning of the Crown Jewels in the centuries-old coronation ceremony, The Coronation shows these objects of astonishing beauty in new high-resolution footage. The film tells the extraordinary story of St Edward's Crown, which was destroyed after the English Civil War and remade for the Coronation of Charles II in 1661. It has only been worn by Her Majesty once, at the moment she was crowned.
On 2 June 1953, on one of the coldest June days of the century and after 16 months of planning, The Queen set out from Buckingham Palace to be crowned at Westminster Abbey, watched by millions of people throughout the world. A ceremony dating back more than a thousand years was to mark the dawn of a new Elizabethan age.
Viewing both private and official film footage, The Queen recalls the day when the weight of both St Edward's Crown and the hopes and expectations of a country recovering from war were on her shoulders, as the nation looked to their 27 year-old Queen to lead them into a new era.
In the film, The Queen says: 「I've seen one Coronation, and been the recipient in the other, which is pretty remarkable.」
For audiences unfamiliar with the story of the Crown Jewels and the regalia, the film explains their contemporary relevance to the UK as a nation and to the enduring purpose and the work of monarchy. They are symbols of the relationship between the Sovereign and the people, and the duties and responsibilities of leadership.
The film also features eyewitness accounts of those who participated in the 1953 Coronation, including a maid of honour who nearly fainted in the Abbey, and a 12 year-old choirboy who was left to sing solo when his overwhelmed colleagues lost their voices.
有点没必要的长，闪回也觉得不是很必要，时间线混乱，还有别人提到的妆造问题 让人无法第一时间分清时间线。
是我没get到的一部艾伦·索金作品了，化妆师怎么可以把妮可基德曼化得这么不像妮可基德曼。
最佳女主角妮可，閃回想起了「時時刻刻」，重新解構歷史有意義嗎，當然！誰掌握了過去就掌握了未來！
老派的故事融入当下现状，疫情时代、人工智能将人与人的距离拉远，门外色彩斑斓的世界充满着危险。窗口窥视和杀人录音致敬了希区柯克的《后窗》及帕尔玛的《凶线》。索德伯格一小博大，视听调度显其功底。
记住一句很random的台词 'The world he is from has a very narrow definition of manhood.' 哪里又不是这样。
P.S1：三个干脏活的应变能力实在太差，2022年能让一个语音助手整不会了，你喊一声小度小度滚犊子不就完了。
觉得挺好看的呀。基德曼阿姨越看越觉得演的很厉害。
Aaron Sorkin never disappoints...But Nicole's face...
就欣赏妮可吧 她的腿几乎到了一般人胸的高度
1.5，索德伯格试图通过旧式的电影思维打造一部非常“酷”的影片，涉及疫情隔离，创伤应激，以及女性，互联网公司等流行议题，却包裹在一个类《后窗》的悬疑模式之下，电脑世界（视听的技术延展）和窗外的“真实世界”倒错，后者反而更像是一个无事发生的移动设备界面。但是《KIMI》这些不过是学生剧组般的片场小聪明，影片既无批判力度，又不属于真正的黑客。智能仪器KIMI的设定没有呈现技术/隐私之间的问题，而是实行了一种类中华未来主义（华为主义）产品功能的纪录片，“有良知”的监控者是一个仁慈的权力机器，被视为问题的结果而非动因。另一方面，Zoe饰演的蓝发黑客女孩也并不是一个真正意义上的自闭极客，她的表演既不冷感，也并不酷，反而十分滥情感性，更像是扮成极客去夜店疯狂享受生活与感情的那一类人。
旁人的回忆与当事者的表演，高频度的对白杂糅到了一起。总的来说，仍然还是纪录片的手段。
喜欢艾伦索金 私心加一星 | light 5
被妮可这个人物打动了，姐姐棒棒，还是4星吧。一个在肥皂剧里面演傻blondie的她其实是这个世界上最有独立意识的女人。她一幕又一幕地磨剧集，果然认真是最动人的。还有承认自己是communist，她一次又一次证明自己不是dummy。心碎的是为了观众一群最优秀的女性不得不掩盖自己的才华，她们仨并排坐的时候，有心痛到。但总的来说我对这个电视的韶华时代couldnt care less. 三段插叙的结构还是好玩，但太多内部梗了，仿佛在看60年代的snl，我猜可能就是要做一个对比：电视剧里的silly jokes 和拍剧时的辛辣讽刺。问题是，我都get不到，得拍给老美国电视迷才懂吧。（补充：那是一个大演员时代，但也看出男的傻子在行业里的统治地位，事实证明女的也有（更有）喜剧才华
A fila that makes you wonder what happened to Aaron Sorkin’s marriage. 这个故事的完成度依然很好，剧本依然话痨，妮可基德曼依然不老，但是看完让人觉得“为什么拍了这样一个电影呢？”
呃，能不能少拍一点这种裹脚布一样又臭又长的传记电影，除了助力演员冲奥看不出来有任何可鉴之处…
Again and again, Aaron Sorkin proved to be just a mediocre director
结尾真棒 Lucy和Desi超有魅力 但其他人物很单薄
不好意思受到豆瓣恶评影响快进看完此片，怠慢了。演得很好，故事也讲得很好，巧妙与追求并举！
影后妮可基德曼，就正常发挥的水平，人物经历和故事精彩程度没有同期提名的塔米菲好看。
70/100 索金的特点还是很明显的，但闪回内容还是长了。原以为会是轻喜剧打底，没想到是这么压抑的故事。一个喜剧女演员在父权环境中走向自我，复杂的背景显得这个人物更加的传奇，其他的倒也显得电影的主题有些分散了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
