Whenever I see La Paura I think of it as a companion piece to Eyes Wide Shut, or maybe it is the other way around. Adultery makes both films tick but in different ways. I think Phillip French was right on the money when he pointed out a Wizard of Oz thing in Kubrick's last work. Like Dorothy, Tom and Nicole go through fantasies and nightmares and at the end Dorothy's reassuring childish motto "there's no place like home" is ironically updated to the adult circumstantial adage "there's no sex like marital sex". Kubrick's take is intellectual, he never leaves the world of ideas to touch the ground. He taunts the audience first with an erotic movie and then with a thriller and refuses to deliver either of them. He was married to his third wife for 40 years, until he died. Rossellini was still married to Ingrid Bergman when he directed La Paura; they had been adulterous lovers and their infidelity widely criticized La Paura is a tale, a noirish one. The noir intrigue is solved and the tale has a happy ending. The city is noir; the country is tale, the territory where childhood is possible. The transition is operated in the most regular way: by car, a long-held shot taken from the front of the car as it rides into the road, as if we were entering a different dimension. Irene (Bergman) starts the movie: we just see a dark city landscape but her voice-over narration tells us of her angst and informs us that the story is a flashback, hers. Bergman's been cheating on her husband. At first guilt is just psychological torture but soon expands into economic blackmail and then grows into something else. From beginning to end the movie focuses on what Bergman feels, every other character is there to make her feel something. Only when the director gives away the plot before the main character can find out does he want us to feel something Bergman still can't. When she finds out, we have already experienced the warped mechanics of the situation and we may focus once again on the emotional impact it has on Bergman's Irene. In La Paura treasons are not imagined but real, nightmares are deliberate and the couple's venom suppurates in bitter ways. Needless to say, Ingrid has another of her rough rides in the movies but Rossellini doesn't dare put her away as he did in Europa 51, nor does he abandon her to the inscrutable impassivity of nature (Stromboli). His gift is less transcendent and fragile than the conclusion of Viaggio in Italia. He just gives his wife as much of a fairy tale ending as a real woman can have, a human landscape where she can finally feel at home. Back to the country, a half lit interior scene where shadows suggest the comfort of sleep. After all, it's the "fairy godmother" who speaks the last words in the movie.
我觉得女主并不是电影里那样看起来起初就温良无害 她是有各种动作和心思 只是随着家人…事情发展十几年来都不正常 也许她的自杀才较为合理了。只是既然叫天怒，傻逼男主怎么还有了归宿。这个电影真的奇奇怪怪。
几场枪戏完全没有看点，还一定要用慢镜头加配乐给你放，导演是不是太自恋。
它用类似于微小说的方式，讲述了人生的一种状态，这个状态和《日落》这个片名很契合，这让片子变得有点高级。而且它讲故事的手段，从摄影配乐到演员表演都朴实无华，导演虽然确实有货真价实的人生感悟，但全程淡定，不显山露水，直到最后片名出来才让你茅厕顿开。那一刻我觉得，导演对这样的人生状态是有感悟的，可能自己就经历过，也可能目睹至亲好友经历过，总之拿捏得挺到位，像我这种还没经历过的都立马和蒂姆罗斯演的这个角色产生了共鸣，虽然前一秒我还不是很看得起他。
这部电影的故事小，同时也更细腻饱满。命运就像多米诺骨牌一样，是一系列连锁反应的结果。注定这不是一个简单的个人故事，却有着深远的意义。简单低调，充满惊喜，层次丰富又不造作
这次不够陷落。不是那个系列。
还不错，近一两个月来唯一能看下来的电影，但是我就想知道毒蘑菇事件，罗圈腿男主具体怎么操作？
观感意外还不错，不要试图理解他们究竟在想什么，因为他们是富二代。
挺好的，同态复仇式的结局很合我这种落后红脖子的胃口。
男性小说家引经据典，正义化自己的报复行为。女主对小说家提起性骚扰诉讼，精神不太好的妻子看到诉讼挂号信后，一时激动溺死两人的女儿，随后服药自尽。他认为这都是女主的错，是女主勾引在先，他要「以眼还眼，以牙还牙，以命换命」，最终害的女主家破人亡。更可恶的是即便女主自杀了，他还是没有放弃复仇，诱骗了女主妹妹——对一切一无所知，失去所有亲人后孤苦无依的17岁未成年。
真有个同学是这样。学校周日晚上进去周五放出来。她说双休日已经有同居男友了，再在学校找个周间男友。好自私好可怕。
一个吻引发的血案！？开始女主出现的时候我以为她就是男主老婆来着，结果不是？那场面镜头表达真的让人误会啊！结局其实挺好的，谁对谁错每个人理解不一样。男主老归老，但是真的很有味道啊。女主傻怂美？！
前期的悬疑和多线配上这个结局就变成了故弄玄虚。
有点警局大逃杀的味道，一个警局，感觉没一个是好人。
我们都知道了原作カツセマサヒコ是个网络写手。2018年，他在推特创作了十几篇微小说。这些微小说后来不知怎地被买走翻拍成网剧。松本花奈接手，担任导演和编剧。两人至此产生了联系。
逃避也许能让自己爽几天，但是改变不了命运。
一定要按个缘由去让不参加母亲葬礼的局外人顺理成章地堕落。
我日日夜夜的贫穷与富足
所谓黎明时分就是毕业即将步入社会工作的时候
用KIRINJI的Aliens当闹钟 这个床可以不用起了
非常精彩，个人认为男作家的报复应该并未结束，下一个目标是妹妹。而且妹妹最后的结局可能会像作家的妻子
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
