A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
看的第一部洪常秀，本来还怕看不进去，试试却意外地对胃口。用对白串联碎片化的故事情节，用黑白铺垫最后的色彩，固定机位下的电影画面如同是小说文字的直观呈现。小说家的电影，虽然单调，但还挺浪漫的。
酒桌那场，像在参加真实的含中年男人量过高的聚会，令人疲惫。
啾迪….前途不可限量。默默哭的一部片子，又无力又悲伤，现实的悲歌。好在，压在所有的无奈之下的，是真实的情感。或者爱就是潘多拉盒子最后的东西，起码不是一片荒漠。
天色尚早，但很快就会暗下来，趁着白日漫漫，我们一起去散步吧。
如今我们还在新冠的阴霾下继续摇摆
看到结尾字幕出现真是感动。看完真想拉踩一下《中国医生》，完全是痴迷于粗糙的“宏观大格局叙事”而不加节制，人物工具化得无法无天，刻意煽情泛滥。而本片，手持跟拍镜头极具表现力，朱迪科默强大的表演令人动容，剧本无处不在针砭时弊，同时人物依旧鲜活、有血有肉。无论如何，医护工作者真的很伟大。
电影讲了一个小说家想要拍个贴近生活，故事自由发展的电影的故事。 所以这个电影就是小说家拍出的结果?
结结实实的给看哭了。WE need to see this film right now! and It's 2022.
1. 疫情所造成的创伤将伴随我们这一代人。
很难再给洪的电影打五星，从实验性陷入（带点贬义的）私人，可观影体验总还是美妙
是，它是一种不同于主旋律的视角，但确实也不够好；尤其那个急匆匆让警察出现的结尾，仿佛就是为了安排朱迪那一段愤怒质疑英国政府的台词，那般无力却又设计感十足，那一瞬间我想到了肯洛奇，但很遗憾，本片导演永远都不会成为肯洛奇。
看得时候感觉就像是洪尚秀的自传 看到结尾的时候发现果然是
本片明艳的黑白摄影，显得凝重，很符合洪几乎定格的场景互动风格，很显然在这里，洪的推镜更慢了，情节的衔接更舒服，但也没失去洪独特的文本性。
不满镜头的美感不够以及摄影的载体太过于刻意，看到最后发现洪根本不在意这点，而正是想表达忙于镜头下被拍摄的人和人之间真实的联系，偶遇、虚伪、亲密、友好聚会，拍电影和写小说背后的秘密是没人关心的，最后拍得成功与否也不是重要的，好像以上这些就是正是要表达的核。秀恩爱的满屏浪漫在击碎我的心，告诉大家“你们真的不重要，我有敏喜！”。
有很多想说的，但其实又没啥好说的。我们都是一粒灰。
我并非站在洪这种创作模式的反面，但是这点内容老洪翻来覆去的拍大家翻来覆去的看，尤其连结构都几乎放弃了之后，大家真的不累吗……
7分。疫情中成为孤堡的一个英国护理中心。说孤堡也不准确，孤独的坟墓比较恰当。最精彩的一幕是朱迪·科默值夜班那段。病患在床上极度不适，所有的救援机构都没办法提供援助，朱迪·科默饰演的护理人员束手无策。哪怕想要帮病患翻个身也不行，最后只能向护理中心早期失智的一个男病人求助。那一夜的无助、无望、愤怒和恐惧让朱迪身心疲惫，只有那位男病人在关键时刻给了她支持，这也是她后来把男病人救出护理中心的原因。已经发生过这么多的不幸，丰富的经验和教训能不能让人们在再次面对此类事件时不重蹈覆辙？
诗集和电影，戏里戏外的浪漫告白，全部给缪斯金敏喜。各种借电影喊话的明显意味，也挺有意思的。
金敏喜演技太松弛了。收回打开电影前我说她不去演其他导演的片子是种浪费这句话，毕竟人家在电影里直接和所有这样想的人隔空对话：到底浪费什么了呢？干你屁事呢？
望远镜处的搭话。对话当然干涩尴尬难以为继。点破生气过往。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
