Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
林漫威写的歌好汉密尔顿风啊，写的词让每个人物都活起了we don't talk about bruno音乐剧风最强。👍(Bruno的配音是照着林漫威选的吗，唱歌的时候好像啊)
呦，这一家都是女强啊，都是上门女婿啊啊啊！！！总之一句话，“不听老人言，快活好些年！”，至理名言！！
迪士尼煽情的功力依旧，虽然，但是在电影院听歌看着眼花缭乱的画面还是被戳到眼泪汪汪的。南美大陆的故事的核心就是Family. 一大群家人住在一起的那种family…… 要怎么做才是对这个家庭有利的，希望与此同时别忘了问一问当事人真正的意愿。虽然，但是这一家子人物的故事，结束之后只记住了布鲁诺的名字，其他人你们叫啥来着？😂 戴眼镜的主角。
放松点，无需证明什么，都是特别
这是一座魔幻之屋，里头能人无数，有的能集中力量移山倒海，有的监听大家的一言一行。屋之一尊，每天努力地维持着这花团锦簇的盛世，踢走危言耸听的吹哨人。如此生活三十年，直到大厦崩塌。
画面精致色彩漂亮 但故事人物还有歌都有点一般 有句台词疯狂下头就是说那个男的要给女主sister求婚“他想要五个孩子”to hell with him有子宫吗他🙄️
不小心买了3d中配，效果打了一些折扣。还是很喜欢各种细节的，最喜欢Dolores，她好时髦啊！故事本身就一般，没想好怎么收又不得不收了。
结尾部分全身持续通电，迪士尼最最擅长的找回自我和家庭团聚的主题，虽然略显老套，但作为合家欢电影还是绝对的业界第一。迪士尼的世界总是春意盎然百花盛开，六十年如一日的缔造童话般的美好幻梦，此刻我就像站在迪士尼乐园里发疯的林志玲，太感动了
【2022.21】内核的设定真的蛮奇怪的，强行用爱拯救一切
奶奶作为家族的领导者，刚开始也是展现出了刻薄与领导力，针对着没有获得天赋的女主，视她为拖油瓶。可是后来女主对她愤怒的道出了自己的心声后，再来一首歌，再来一场灾难，她们就和解了。很难想象，迪士尼的想象力真就止步于此。
其他都好就是冲突的化解圆不下去，二人拥抱一下就完事了？
抛开政治隐喻，唯一没有天赋的孩子在家族中被指责，被遗忘，这样的设定实在容易让人心疼和共情。迪士尼对完美表象下分崩离析的探讨值得肯定，但放到台面上就是既不完全童话也不完全残酷的，无趣的《魔法满屋》。
昨天看了两部loser成长的故事，剧本都不行。这部因为动画片制作水平在，色彩斑斓又有音乐；看得更愉快一些。但也就bruno no no让我想起林漫威是写了hamilton的人。剧情实在是各种生硬，结尾草率。
以前不理解为什么婆婆反对我去月子中心，为什么土豪朋友不去月子中心坐月子，现在自己去考察了几家踩点，才明白月子中心的确不如宣传的好。首先居住条件就不如家里，即使十几二十万一个月的月子中心，家居条件也是一看就是自己家好，再者吃的也不行，看了一眼他们的月子餐，心里惊呼这样的食材也能上桌，家里随便一顿的花费都比月子中心一整个星期的餐食贵吧，来月子中心到底是享受还是简朴来了。不过在月子中心有医护人员护理，专业性比月嫂强点，倒应该是个优势，还有长辈没法插手也是优点，家里虽然有月嫂和阿姨，长辈也插不上手，但插嘴点评的机会的确多得多
剧情可能相对来说比较弱，但很适合带小孩子去看
2022-04-16
高开低走。设定的展开、大力士姐姐和预言家舅舅的人设都立得很稳，但从花姐的转变就开始突兀了，从此一发不可收拾，后边全程WTF。有一说一，歌舞真不错。
都什么年代了，迪士尼还以为这种廉价的爱和包容就能打动人心?
剧情不够唱歌凑，吵架把家人撕裂，拥抱再重建家园。鸡汤满满，馊气呛鼻。迪士尼只剩下画面了。5
在澳门看了粤语场【我觉得我粤语听力家可以90-95分了】
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
