Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
想要一个这样的家，适宜温度的洗澡水，吃不完的饭，马上就能喝到的冰水。治愈，但感觉又有点普通。
能把一个如此焦虑的话题处理的轻松温馨，尤其在当下相当的应景治愈。生前葬礼竟然喜欢处理的比非诚勿扰好。日本演员就是有种神奇的能力，演的浮夸又让人入戏
老奶奶向無家可回的兩個女孩伸出了手，光是這個設定就好令人動容。無血緣的家。只要真誠以對，心有所願，迷途之家就會為你實現。不思議人的神怪傳奇。悲傷與恐懼會幻化成怪，但家的羈絆能破除迷幻。輕巧簡易的敘事鋪排。失語的小女孩開口呼喚的那刻，以她的視角將故事收攏。
用一种喜剧化的 温情的手法讲了一个很残酷的事实 很可爱很鸡血 仅此而已
真的太好看了，太治愈了，破防了好几次！这个评分绝对低估了，虽然有的人可能感觉打斗场面太小了，但是这个就是治愈番，不需要大规模场面。我真的感觉画面非常美，日的夏天就是yyds，淡淡的温馨的感觉～
天海女士破大防......
普通的灾后治愈故事，找到新家人。不过套了神话表现，还算有点想法。
好想住在沿海的高山房子里，房顶长有花花草草，院子里的篱笆上也长满了花，后院是悬崖和大海～梦中情屋～
更像是一部国家宣传片，没有钱养老，可以降低欲望，可以换种方式生活，可以不理睬别人强加给我们的焦虑，只要像鸵鸟一样假装一切都看不见，就可以happy ending了。
精美的制作反衬了导演面对宏大叙事的无能和故事一滩糊糊……旅游宣传还得看我《有顶天家族》。
谁不想拥有一个能跟佛祖和合同交流的房东，以及一个如多拉a梦一样的家呢
想要一个这样的家，适宜温度的洗澡水，吃不完的饭，马上就能喝到的冰水。治愈，但感觉又有点普通。
半部好片。作为“后3·11”题材，巧妙错位在于比起灾难的创伤，姐妹俩比灾难更早地面临原生家庭的创伤。开篇的漫步路过了城市与自然，路过了灾难的废墟，此步履不停之姿既是回家，但这个家又是刚组成的新拟似家族，只有“来”到了家，这个家才开始形成。因此，漫步作开场便已开始酝酿着灾后的内面和家族的重建。川面一直有意保持着这种不让内面自白溢出的克制，仅仅看着她们的苦难，但仅有克制而缺少其他方面的支撑的话，恐怕并不能面对中段的主题转变——从拯救自己转向拯救城市的创伤。
松重丰和天海佑希主演 卡司好好豪华啊 但是天海佑希一看就是花钱大手大脚的人啊！看五郎吃东西就是一种治愈啊！
剧情一般
前半部分巨搞笑，今年观感最欢乐的新片。搞笑来源却是东亚中产的共同焦虑，病不起，葬不起，住不起，结婚成本，中年失业危机，养老压力，就差教育压力没提了…
这部居然给我好多快乐，笑了好多。
画面漂亮 故事简单 有些画风很有科技感和创意感 下饭的小治愈 不烧脑 不挑拨情绪 像夏天的绿豆糖水 不是很甜 但很舒服
因为女王，所以不忍心吐槽，但真的太像不走心的宣传片了……
画面挺好的。故事有点不给力。以温馨来映衬家庭悲剧？而且家庭悲剧不是很深刻。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
