Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
恩师的意外，搭档的自戕，母子的关系…
网飞这个传记片拍法，还停留在《社交网络》出现前的10年代。
张导永远不让人失望，这是一部由小见大的讲述抗美援朝作品，讲述中国人的作品，九十几分钟里，我感到自己已经深深认识了五班的每一个战士，五班永远在，我们都是五班
看完想听中岛美雪
身陷落魄之时，师母还能对师父笑着说，
-.-为啥一个子弹射击出膛的镜头要用那么多次呢。。好廉价啊
1.师徒情深，寓情于乐，结尾小酒馆合作，一唱一和默契至极，不过影帝演的年轻北野武太谦逊有礼了简直OOC。
3.5吧。严格来讲，这是一部一般的电影，每个桥段都似曾相识，构思上，设计上也无独到，新颖之处。如果没有北野武加持，这就是部很一般的电影，可这偏偏就是北野武的半部传。可是依然没办法，可能这片能感动北野武，但无法感动我，就算从上世纪九十年代就迷恋北野武，我也无法因为他而感动——这片实在是太套路了，太不北野武了。唯一有情绪触动的两处是北野武原声唱《浅草小子》的两处，第二处还被老年北野武的妆给破坏了——直接让本人出镜岂不是直接拉升了影片的冲击力？！怎么想的。
子弹时间确实多了点，96分钟跟紧凑，高能一个接一个，观众喝彩全然是为先烈们的英雄气概，章宇的演技越来越好，五班精神感动鼓舞人心。
真的是一场很小的战斗，但是就是一场场小战斗赢得了整个胜利。
北野武的个人特色太过强烈，真不是很好演的，影帝太精致了总少了很多感觉。单纯从这片来说，师傅这个角色更有存在感和魅力一些吧。
“我现在算是理解关东煮的心情了。”
只知身前名，莫解身后事。我们只知道成功的北野武和他好看的作品，却不知道他有这样一个成就他的师傅和他那段艰难奋斗的经历。追求梦想的路上，有的人向生活低头而放弃，有的人在坚持。坚持的人或胜或败，放弃的人也并非失败，多归于平凡。时代在变，人心在变，一味固守，恐怕要被淘汰。铃木做艺伎受欢迎？未免年纪太大了吧。柳乐优弥表演的北野武竟真有几分神似。
从小看到大的那些抗日电影即便是脸谱化奇观化脱离实际地讴歌化，至少「反法西斯战争」的本质是 legit 的。而关于这场战争，即便是「命题作文」，我也期待有创作者能「真话不全说，假话全不说」。可惜张艺谋也没能做到。
当然 如果子弹时间的次数再稍微少一点 个别情节再更加紧凑一点 那就更完美了
虽然套路很多，但远方的酒一样的歌声里，北野武为师父拿了那双鞋，无法不被那份彼此的了解与情谊打动。也忽然明白，他滚烫而坚硬的人生里，那份温热与细腻来自何处。大泉洋虽然有点像陈汉典，但将旧式剧场喜剧人的姿态表演得不失分寸，惊喜。
张艺谋用穿梭在冰与雪之间的身影，带来了太多震撼。
门胁的哭戏是对火花里告别演出的callback。看到creepy nuts的时候，正好m1败者复活，真是巧。
说实话，成片质量看下来感觉还是蛮有说服力的，仿佛这个事情真的很有可能发生在飞机大炮冲刺的战场上。除去艺术加工后的细节，说真的。这个故事还是很有共情的几个瞬间。
由于对长津湖第一部的观感一般，不打算看第二部，就看了这一部。大场面上，比不上长津湖第一部，但是观赏性很强，比起长津湖第一部好太多，尤其是剧情（故事），悬念，转折，煽情，先抑后扬，最后宣泄的一段个人感觉夸张了，但是当年那场战争，不正是让世界看到了奇迹吗？片尾加⭐！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
