A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
我吐了，这编剧是在用脚写剧本吗，逻辑不顺人物不符，不科幻不灾难不动作，我看了个啥啊md！华谊塞那个中国女人进来干什么？美国将军的儿子为什么说中文还有中国奶妈？军方家属撤离为何没有保护？从没受过任何训练的人上太空毫无反应？将军最后反水太突然了毫无铺垫，雪地追车那段确定不是只为了给雷克萨斯金主爸爸打广告？小年轻之间的疑似感情戏是在搞笑吗？史前文明那段我直接wtf了！强行上升家庭是完完全全的失败，父子解恩仇也和过家家一样，想搞末日废土那一套也是彻头彻尾的失败；又臭又长真尼玛无语，除了登月那条线感觉编剧简直是想到哪儿写到哪儿，所有人都是工具人，毫无独立具体的个体人物塑造，作为灾难片连半点紧张感都没有，除了海啸升空那边我内心没有半点波澜，只觉得这电影怎么还没能结束，画面宏大之外别的没半点能看
从来不用怀疑麦克尔贝作品的激烈程度，但也无法期待更多。作为一部翻拍电影，135分钟的时长略显拖沓，尽管杰克吉伦哈尔在演绎反面角色上从来都有更好的天赋，但这仍然是一部除了视觉方面没有任何惊喜的电影，倘若不是真的有好点的屏幕，那实在没有冒着风险去电影院的价值。
看不下去了，剧情太烂，夜晚的几场戏特效也假，抠图痕迹明显。
电影前一个小时我忍了，至少还行，虽然KC出乎意料的对了，但还是有一群相信外星人的人说一些莫名其妙的内容，而且背后贴的是什么外星人阴谋论，加上汽车背后贴的各种标志，而且他是怎么克服这些疾病加上肥胖，轻松上太空，还能顺利完成任务的，还有时间拍照？
不知道该说是想的太多还是想象力太差，莫不如来点直接的，就月球撞地球世界末日算了，把不要抬头最后几分钟演它一小时
2.5 这应该属于新神话故事吧？
依旧是罗兰·艾默里奇的灾难风格，人类造物主那里有点扯，灾难场面很刺激，很久没看到过这么经典设定的灾难片了
现在看这种片子真的有种陈旧过时感，疫情天灾都已经让人不想活了，还管它撞不撞地球，那就撞吧，一起毁灭吧～
2星。在电影院这剧情对不起我，在家看对不起这特效。剧情太老套，设定够扯的。
还不错，场面恢宏，虽然存在一些BUG，但一部爆米花电影，又不是科教片。
不过是白嫖的，多一星
顶级视觉特效+爆米花合家欢剧情，美式政治正确体现于家庭高于一切，天文推论都很扯，不过随便看看特效爽爽倒是没必要走脑……
从某种层面来说，这电影如此之蠢，以至于都有点可爱了哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈哈
迈克尔贝还是舍得花钱的。 动作戏与大场面的水准还是毋庸置疑的，就是太磨叽，太长了。 最后对黑人罪犯的见死不救是个惊喜point，味儿对了！This is America，mother fucker！（冲这个多打一星）
哈哈哈 下饭大烂片 后爸无用的牺牲 为了煽情而煽情
天上星球大战，地下速度与激情，重塑人类进化论，打造全新地月理论，浪漫陪转40亿年，人性挣扎情感落点齐活，震撼视觉盛宴，美丽国傻逼发核弹，惊天阴谋论害全家，兲巣好朋友送温暖，你不上映谁还配上映？扯淡，实在太TM扯淡了。
后面各种灾难片和科幻片两条线互相交叉，然后Jo Fowler的丈夫一群人被压到就没后文了，这基地防御也太差了，居然不多建地下几层，丈夫就直接相信她。
预期极低，意外还行，非常规灾难片，而是月球“阴谋论”，中间还剩40分钟时一度以为要脑洞大开，结果又止于AI哗变的老生常谈，剧情就好像在看星门某集AU：假设古人与replicators+纳米机器人大战失败后在不同星系留下了许多古人科技前哨站，而这个AU版里只留下了月球。不懂是不是要拍续集，地球部分滥俗，月球部分视效还是不错的。
看这种片子不就是看个脑洞吗
一样的套路，为什么这部能如此难看……忽略阴谋论以及是否科学，角色设定也太糟糕了吧，台词也是不及格，所有剧情转折和人物对话都无比生硬，演技居然也没有在线的。佩服热门短评，吐槽比我写得好，然后还能打两星，太善良了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
