A sharp, witty, mind-expanding and exuberant foray into the world of logic with computer scientist Professor Dave Cliff. Following in the footsteps of the award-winning 'The Joy of Stats' and its sequel, 'Tails You Win - The Science of Chance', this film takes viewers on a new rollercoaster ride through philosophy, maths, science and technology- all of which, under the bonnet, run on logic.
Wielding the same wit and wisdom, animation and gleeful nerdery as its predecessors, this film journeys from Aristotle to Alice in Wonderland, sci-fi to supercomputers to tell the fascinating story of the quest for certainty and the fundamentals of sound reasoning itself.
Dave Cliff, professor of computer science and engineering at Bristol University, is no abstract theoretician. 15 years ago he combined logic and a bit of maths to write one of the first computer programs to outperform humans at trading stocks and shares. Giving away the software for free, he says, was not his most logical move...
With the help of 25 seven-year-olds, Professor Cliff creates, for the first time ever, a computer made entirely of children, running on nothing but logic. We also meet the world's brainiest whizz-kids, competing at the International Olympiad of Informatics in Brisbane, Australia.
'The Joy of Logic' also hails logic's all-time heroes: George Boole who moved logic beyond philosophy to mathematics; Bertrand Russell, who took 360+ pages but heroically proved that 1 + 1 = 2; Kurt Godel, who brought logic to its knees by demonstrating that some truths are unprovable; and Alan Turing, who, with what Cliff calls an 'almost exquisite paradox', was inspired by this huge setback to logic to conceive the computer.
Ultimately, the film asks, can humans really stay ahead? Could today's generation of logical computing machines be smarter than us? What does that tell us about our own brains, and just how 'logical' we really are...?
这才是我大DC应有的水准😭😭六个人都是必不可少，每个人都是必要的成分，没一个短板，但是老爷真的弱得搞笑，看得最轻松的四小时电影之一。我劝华纳好自为之，快点把扎导请回来，为我大DC创造美好前途。最后的片段是不义联盟吗！！！我要看she了！！
确实是比之前院线版那个不伦不类的电影强太多了，所有人物都有了更立体的形象，整个故事动机和走向也更有逻辑了。只是四个小时真的是太长了，对于普通观众实在很劝退……其实更大的责任在DC，在没有单人电影先期介绍角色的情况下推进正联，这个结果就是必然的：要么因为时长关系没法让观众了解角色、电影失败；要么为了更完整的故事线而不得不超长时长，提高了观影门槛。PS：完全不知道\不记得郑恺有在这个电影里，看到的时候被吓到了，而且没想到还是个超英——原子侠。
虽然说9.0的评分对于这部正联确实有点高了，但没办法，和尾灯版对比实在是太出色了
你把一坨屎放了几年来除味，撒上淀粉和水烤焙使他变大，插上巧克力棒和玉米粉，再做个造型，旁边摆上鲜花。它还是一坨屎，本质没有变。
Holy guacamole!!! I don’t know how to address my feelings right now; I have the urge to scream, laugh and cry a river all over me. As a DC fangirl for over a decade, I felt like I just had a 4-hour-long orgasm. Seriously, I need to sip some tea and chill for a moment. What the heck just happened? Was that even real?
4.5，荒原狼真是我看过目的性最强最明确的反派了，说抢母盒就真的只是抢母盒，对杀人毫无兴趣，哪怕路人甲都没舍得杀一下，荒原狼能有什么坏心思呢，他只不过是想回家罢了～
9分就离谱。都是小学生跟风？看到稍微黑暗点画风就评高分？和原版对比下就以为吊打全世界了？一个考60分的对比考10分的 当然是吊打。但是60分的就60分。还有别去这个豆瓣小组。他们管理员妥妥nc。很多我见过正常讨论有理有据的内容都会被删除 只要说一点不好就会。
蝙蝠侠高光时刻不间断，真正配得上漫画形象，回梦与《蝙超》衔接，更黑暗的未来，与漫画互文，黑超人，火星猎人，绿灯侠，正义联盟元老们悉数回归，还有原子侠，难以按耐激动的心情。
“他如果不交代，我就要来硬的！”……荒原狼搞得笑场好几次，嘴炮类boss典范，攻心二流，战斗力三流。
花了两周时间断断续续看完，整体比公映版好的多。钢骨，闪电侠有完整的人物线，但时长真的太长了，根本不适合院线。另外，为什么所有Boss都自带低音炮
把尾灯版的补拍尬戏废戏全部拿掉后，风格统一了，故事也饱满多了，4小时并不会觉得难以忍受。
比如爹为狗死，比如我妈是玛莎，比如这次的蝙蝠侠手接超人镭射眼（有人想拿手套材质说事的，你们是觉得超人不会转眼珠吗？以及荒原狼的盔甲都抵不住镭射眼攻击，你们能接受阿福发明出更牛逼的材料，那你们和扎克真的很配）。
另外，扎導是超人粉还是啥？整天想着将他比喻成耶稣，想着神性人性，让他仇大苦深做什么呢？反而真正仇大苦深的蝙蝠侠变成了一个像是赶时间交差的暴发户。
说导剪版又有如何高的里程碑造诣倒也是不必，无非也仅是1.33:1的讨喜画幅，与古铜质感下扎式美学搭配超英题材后的奇妙化学反应，再有比巴卜泡泡糖般恶心反胃的院线版在前垫底，扎导的审美情趣与叙事能力便更加突出又惹人喜爱，而这场大戏最精彩的部分，必然是戏剧以外导演的艺术执着以及粉丝与大厂巨贾间博弈的故事，这或许能给华纳更或许能给全球各国电影厂商高层们上上一课
扎导崇拜力量感，古典美，神圣美，所以他拍超人，怎么拍怎么好，钢铁之躯，力与美。但是拍蝙蝠侠就拍不好，蝙蝠侠是黑暗骑士，这个黑暗不是指色调，是复杂曲折的剧情，诡谲与智谋，而不是莽夫，这方面扎导几乎是白痴，所以他拍不好最伟大的超级英雄蝙蝠侠。
感激，感动，感恩。谢谢扎导及团队在背后默默付出的一切，兴奋，欣慰，且知足，不枉费四年的等待。作为粉丝回顾这段心路：从“Is it real?”猜想到“Realease The Snyder Cut！”运动再到这部作品真正的呈现在我们面前，像做梦一样。这部电影足够特别，在有限条件下，扎导费尽心血献给所有热爱JL最好的礼物，致所有勇敢的DCFans！
2021.03.18
How to make a Snyder cut: 1. Average storytelling = montage + voiceover 2. Highlight moments = slow motion
【Crave】按照这个体量，把故事讲完整是正常的，是应该的；但按照这个体量，如果只局限在把故事讲完整，就太不应该了
感觉当年拍电影的时候就奔着下流拍的，所以现在努力往下剪也删不利索那些镜头。节奏有问题，没有主次。ps.我只想看WW打人（。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
