Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
最近看的战争片最好的一部了。唯一的败笔就是最后开挂。迫击炮没搞死他，重机枪没搞死他，狙击手没搞死他。一个连没搞死他，这一个连就跑了。。。
在真实展现志愿军风貌这一方面，无出能文能武李延年其右者。这部电影虽较其它同题材影片改善了很多，还是有些老毛病，但总体而言是部佳作，7.7评分很合理了。当然或许有观众恶心男主演员的，可以忽略他本人试着看看，角色是角色。
本来就不好演，还搞多余的面瘫设定真是累赘，幸好影帝撑住了，连声音都模仿的很像。大泉洋非常惊喜，剧团一人剧本节奏很多漫才思维，整体来讲还是不错的。
喜欢这种场景单一却又把每个人物刻画很深刻，时长也刚刚好，氛围也营造的恰到好处
一场狙击手的战斗，从故事到画面都是极简的战争片 ，雪地里的热血人。张艺谋太懂国人的点了，一步一步抓住你，从开始到结束哭了好几次；这次张艺谋还是编剧之一。章宇的四川话好亲切，从《东北虎》到四川话，章宇真是可南可北。PS. 看到了《坚如磐石》的贴片广告，真的快上映了吧，期待。
2.对喜剧的尊严三令五申：“不要被人笑，要逗人笑”“不要靠扮丑，要靠表演逗人笑”
三星半，应该还是张艺谋女儿的作品，有很多不成熟地方
很有质感的影片；《狙击手》的命运自然逃离不了与《长津湖》《水门桥》相比较的命运；后者标志着中国电影视效的新篇章；那前者就是标志着张艺谋依然是那个刻画小人物命运的张艺谋，化繁为简，让人恍惚这不像是张艺谋的风格；这种敢于突破自己风格，不断开发新的可能，让人值得倾佩；我不知道影院版结局是死去的战友答到还是网络版如此；我更倾向于后者；如同《药神》吕受益和黄毛，自然升华，自然感动，给这白色雪地一抹鲜红的色。
两位主演不说，门胁麦太有韵味了！铃木保奈美一如既往地美。电影本身比较普通。
还行，场景比较简单，就是敌我两组狙击手在一处阵地上斗智斗勇。
柳乐优弥真是抓到了北野武的歪嘴抽搐的精髓，大泉洋的演绎也很不错，甚至形象比传主更加立体。
由于对长津湖第一部的观感一般，不打算看第二部，就看了这一部。大场面上，比不上长津湖第一部，但是观赏性很强，比起长津湖第一部好太多，尤其是剧情（故事），悬念，转折，煽情，先抑后扬，最后宣泄的一段个人感觉夸张了，但是当年那场战争，不正是让世界看到了奇迹吗？片尾加⭐！
最后十五分钟我哭得好大声......全程都能感受到师匠和徒弟那种真挚的感情，浅草法兰西座那种人与人之间的联结到现在的日本还是随处可见。北野武竟然肯同意让大泉洋来演自己的师父，真是一种莫大的肯定。
选角就超成功，放那不动就已经把人物演透了。演北野武的甚至还形似他。流畅。用蒙太奇叙事，挺有新意。非常感人
额外一星给北野武，实在是太甜腻了。不过看完《犬之力》再看这个片子，觉得能够喘口气。福尔摩斯有性需求，谁能想到？
整体拍得比较克制，视听语言洗练干净，基本只有黑白红三色充斥全片。故事线也还可以，小视角中腾挪辗转以小见大，三五个交手回合呈现得也算清晰，但唱歌那段真的太突兀，时间也过长，感觉是点明中心思想生怕不突出，非要点死为止。另外，旁白叙事还是生硬了些，最后结尾高潮对决坦克的前因后果交代不明，场景也做了转移，过渡再平滑些就好了。四星。
春节档口碑最佳 无可争议
一般，尤其不喜欢几段表现狙击手枪法精准的子弹时间。
非一般形式传记片，只是截取了北野武师从深见迈入谐星坦途这感人的一段，千里马遇到伯乐，伯乐引导的方式以及豁出脸面背后助推的苦心，实在触动人心，有对传统技艺的感慨，有对法兰西座的感怀，柳乐优弥竭力去演的半张脸，在重返的长镜头里，满含深情。
张艺谋用穿梭在冰与雪之间的身影，带来了太多震撼。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
