After the Great Earthquake in Northeastern Japan, Mitsuo is sent to a mental hospital from the strain of grief from working to clear out the debris of the disaster. When he is released 3 years later, he feels a moment of happiness as he is welcomed back by his brother Yuta, his wife Yoko, their first daughter Chie, and their second daughter Itsuki, who has a down syndrome.The next day, Chie wishes to go to the amusement park, and Mitsuo takes Chie and Itsuki there. But these happy moments don't last long, and the incident happens at the park. Chie dropped Itsuki on the concrete when Mitsuo took his eyes off of them. Yoko cannot accept Itsuki's death, madly questions Chie and Mitsuo. In this pressure, Chie lies that "Uncle Mitsuo dropped Itsuki." As Yoko goes through a mental breakdown from the shock. Becoming full with regret day by day, Yoko accuses Yuta and questions if he felt relieved that Itsuki died. Hearing this fight between her parents, Chie's heart was also slowly being ...
基本上是个爽片啦，但是顶着这么多限制塞文化细节进去，很强了！！电影放完之后还贴了官网链接，基本上是让糖在现代大复活了。谢谢你，执行力很强的乔丹皮尔！
不是我瞧不起GC电影，到底是“不想一個人”，还是“leave me alone” ？小学毕业的我看的云里雾里，就连电影名都搞不清还想拍电影？什么阿猫阿狗都能拍？
又一个不能提名字的伏地魔……黑命贵所以杀人有理？20220201
摄影还是不错的。剧情欠了点火候。演员的颜值和演技都在线。这部电影最大的问题是缺了根有逻辑的主线
不喜欢导演过火的理念。马丁路德金看完泉下都坐不住了
不过这种通过艺术式极端情绪表达，在这部电影中情绪过于平淡而突出的过分油腻而怪诞，仇恨强度和逻辑远不及《天鹅绒圆锯》。其中把亚裔弄走也不能改变神经刀刀的无差别仇杀的评价，切割的非常差。
影片的视觉风格基本延续了乔丹·皮尔现代恐怖片的表现形式，虽然拒心理恐惧的呈现差口气，但整体仍然是新鲜刺激的，不过这结局有点让人齿寒，继续讲述以暴制暴显得粗暴又无奈。
摄影方面还是不错，和都市传说的风格相得益彰；剧本层面是很失败的，连故事的完整性都做不到。
candyman
candyman
自我感觉还可以吧，早期同类电影看的太多，无感了。
candyman
思路还行，但呈现的差强人意，想表达的东西塞进这么一个恐怖片显得很笨重，这种笨重感越到最后越明显。
告诉所有人什么？说你在杀白人？什么狗屁电影，隐喻弄的过度，散布仇恨，毫无章法。
竟然是克里夫巴克的作品，但拍的很一般啊。既不让人回味，也没有什么悬念
镜子梦魇和种族问题相媾和突然失去意趣，乔丹皮儿的政治论文写到这一篇突然让人有些阅读乏味。导演的声画意识、场面调度都很精彩。
题材与模式较为老套，旧瓶装新酒。但其美学艺术体现，运镜，构图，色彩光影处理等等完美弥补了这一缺憾，尤其几处镜像处理可圈可点，个人认为值得四星。
这部片子最有意思的就是借着一个恐怖的都市传说说了一个一定要为黑人平权的大道理
乔丹皮尔剧作的最大特点也是影片评论家所说的“太过直白激进”，从《逃出绝命镇》的新奇刺激到《我们》的还行，最后到这部彻底乏味，部分害怕氛围营造还行，但是全片的政治正确，种族主义，black lives matter的论调真是让人反感。
不要把它当特别翻拍或者传统的恐怖片看，当做用当代语境重新解构概念和故事看，我觉得很cool
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
