剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 答芳馨 8小时前 :

    怎么说呢,这是科幻片,但就都是美国灾难片套路,唯一觉得神奇的是:月亮是个空心球,里面有我们的祖先创造的世界,灾难出现是因为月球这个世界里的AI觉醒后害怕被灭,先主动出击灭绝一切会威胁它的东西。

  • 逮高韵 7小时前 :

    这就是科技兴国吧🚬

  • 晏羡丽 7小时前 :

    剧情只想给二星,关于人文的部分和撞车差不多。给四星的原因是因为,是老婆买的票,是和看问天少年杂志的儿子一起看的。剧情有bug,就有吧。哪有那么多尽善尽美呢。比起电影内容,当下的自己可能更关心的是和谁做了什么。

  • 晨驰 6小时前 :

    尽管决定不看了,但还是下了立马看起来。无法逃避的类型,但是呢,就,唉

  • 柔盛 0小时前 :

    再来几部,确实不错。做成一个系列,还是不错的。

  • 运加 2小时前 :

    这脑洞也儿戏得过于蠢了吧,灾难片场景越来越退步了,不仅特效廉价而且几乎看不见一个灾难片里常见的路人群众,除了主角团两家子外也就两个蠢贼。至于进入月球地洞后简直是科幻电影的超级灾难,如果说前半部分还可以算做廉价特效级别灾难片,后半部分简直是科幻电影俗套刻奇场景大集合的蠢破天的雷人灾难,上亿美金预算的电影就不会找几个靠谱的场景设计师吗,几十亿年跨星际文明级别的场景就这么廉价吗,甚至出现了星球大战级别的舰队火炮

  • 母晓山 9小时前 :

    果然这位大哥帅不过三秒就开始搞笑hahaha~小甜剧还是很好看的。期待赘婿第二部~

  • 雪帛 3小时前 :

    天呐,这个设定也是很喜欢,让我忘记了剧情忘记了演技这回事儿,月球真迷人,肯定有什么小秘密,哈哈。

  • 牧清漪 8小时前 :

    比2012好很多,但是期望不要再搞人种配对了

  • 贵琪睿 2小时前 :

    山姆再次拯救世界。拍的没有以前2012和后天好看。

  • 祁瀚捷 6小时前 :

    哈莉 贝瑞 老了

  • 诺书兰 1小时前 :

    用脚写的剧本都能比这强,强行煽情注水,套路化工具人角色,毫无末世气质,逻辑随时随地硬伤,阴谋论又老又俗,看似特效大片其实棚拍痕迹严重,场景规模小气得要死。不过也算在意料之中,不是陪朋友我本身也不会来看这部片,只能说电影的社交意义远压过了本体质量。

  • 谷安 3小时前 :

    “我只是一个无名小卒…”

  • 田轩秀 3小时前 :

    其实是合格的好莱坞灾难片 虽然题材不新(进入月球内部算吗) 特效也还过得去 地球跟太空两条线都能呼应上 人物也都有交代 电影院看应该会能再加半星 现在分有点低

  • 金元纬 0小时前 :

    特效很不错的

  • 郗紫易 0小时前 :

    前半段都挺好,到了月球之后感觉编剧突然说我编不下去了,直接机械降神,星球大战串台过来了??啥学历没有的胖子比一群NASA大神懂得还多?这设定也太扯了?另外于文文这个角色真的安排的太尬了,为啥不把办公室里面坐到最后的那两个角色其中一个安排给她啊?

  • 静彩 8小时前 :

    看开头还以为中国女孩是Jo的女友,还想说这片子这么woke吗我喜欢,结果到头来是个莫名其妙的交换生,引发了一系列莫名其妙的地球支线,月球设定也比我想象的要无趣得多,还以为是恐怖片不可知走向的,结果是个啥,阴谋论+伪科幻?果然中方投资+好莱坞商业片就不要指望太多。两颗星全给hot af的帕翠和Halle。

  • 袁清晖 2小时前 :

    电影的野心真大,既包括了月球“人”造论,人类起源说,还容纳了人工智能问题的探索……但是就是什么都浅尝辄止,没有真正的内核。听说过附身动物和人的,没听过附身月亮的……

  • 袭熙柔 8小时前 :

    看个热闹,爆米花无脑片。《后天》和《独立日》结合,适合随便看看。

  • 睿驰 1小时前 :

    美式瞎扯(全靠“民科”发现真想;美军干啥不行找人第一名;舍生取义的继父哥;破镜重圆父子),到处拼凑创意(2012、普罗米修斯啥的)的网络文学,和披着科幻外衣的基督教价值故事(神创论、大毁灭balabala)。除了莫名其妙的中文,居然还不算难看,特技加得duangduang的

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved