Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
作为那段时间的亲历者，很难公正地去评价这种题材的文艺作品。片尾曲很好听。
破三亿了，说实话首日就是靠黄渤，贾玲撑，周冬雨撑的三亿，剧情根本很脑残，就是一个打着疫情消费感情的烂片
没去电影院，爱奇艺看的，不知道好不好，反正是从头哭到尾，哭的抽抽，分了好多天才看完。
不太及格啊。 配音口型都对不上，还有很多很尴尬的戏有点失望
在那个冬天，我们一起共度难关，现在才可以拥抱身边的人。
第一，本片不是典型意义的主旋律电影，因为本片中，党和政府是不(直接)在场的。第二，病人和死亡，在电影比重的角度上，同样也不在场。第三，本片的功能不是记录，反映和思考，而是治愈。第四，既然功能是单一的治愈，加之上述的缺席，就难免显得冗长。基本上大厨求婚的段落，电影实际上就已经结束了。第五，本片前半部分的时间线结构，还是有巧思的。或者说，借鉴了《敦刻尔克》。第六，本片开场几分钟，确实足够震撼，而另一个电影时刻在小护士的遗照处。但是吊诡的是，本片的整体结构，是把温情放在了前面，把死亡放在了后面。这不能不又恰好证明了这不是典型的主旋律电影。
疫情下小美好 遇到一个真心对你好的人 或者一段美好的记忆 可以怀念一辈子
四星是打给疫情期间付出很多努力的医护人员和封城后的武汉人民的。里面有好多泪点，护士晓晓的牺牲，志愿者的付出，年迈却依然坚守岗位的医生，在疫情下和解的夫妻，从半场哭到结尾。
勇敢地健康地快乐地活在这个世界上吧！虽然本片有很多bug，不过演员们演技值两星，片尾曲和彩蛋两星。
刻意煽情！咱就是说为什么元旦最后一天来给自己添堵呢？
1.2看的。泪点满满，现实题材特别触动人心，就像看豆友说的，导演影片的压迫感拍的一点不含糊。平常人平凡事嘛，但没有太惊喜。特别出演总是要挂掉的，像周冬雨和朱一龙。
以《撞車》的叙事形式，用不同的点撑起武汉抗疫期间的一个面。贾玲的吸睛指数最高，周冬雨以最少的戏份撑起最大的看点，吴彦姝以83岁高龄和73岁许绍雄谈了一场黄昏恋。虽说主旋律满满，但他们的事迹值得纪念。6.6
在家隔离就想应个景看一下抗疫的故事，万万没想看了更闹心，还好当时没有花钱去电影院看，不然得如坐针毡，如芒在背，尴尬的我脚趾抠地。
8/10.做了奉献和牺牲的人生就是伟大的人生，就应该被歌颂。贾玲真是个宝藏演员，演得太自然了。
温情很多时候也都伴随着苦难，所以不能一次看完，分了好多天，希望悲剧不再重演
几个普通武汉人的故事，相互交汇在疫情笼罩下封城的武汉，这座我第二故乡的城市。刘亚兰、李宏宇夫妇得知好朋友去世时，在鹦鹉洲长江大桥上雨夜里痛苦；实习护士晓晓青春靓丽的照片，最后却成了遗照，摆在为抗议牺牲的医护人员的灵堂里；退休老医生和餐厅老板相濡以沫的爱情，这几个情节让我鼻子一酸，瞬间泪目。电影贵在叙事方式和展现视角，没有宏大叙事，只有人间真情。
疫情中老百姓的温暖故事，大家言重了，挺暖的。
好无聊啊🥱目前看过讲疫情的拍的最没有内容的电影😅中间走神好几次，哭也没哭点，真的也是服了
不同的家庭，不同人，相互交织，抗战疫情，面对生死，很感人。
朱一龙温文尔雅音乐老师很合适，但剧情未免太瞎扯，每段故事都挺异想天开
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
