The history of Danish country church architecture is told by showing scenes of how the church was used by the congregation, beginning with the celebration of mass in a small and simple wooden church 800 years ago, and ending with the congregation singing in a village church of to-day. The development and the growth of the pattern of church architecture is shown.
Dreyer in this film shows a series of churches from different periods with churchgoers in period clothing. Each period is separated by a shot of a church bell double-exposed on the sky. Although the film has a vibrant and instructive way of communicating the different epochs and styles to students, it does not exhibit the artistic quality that usually distinguishes a Dreyer film, except perhaps in some of the costumes, which were originally made for Day of Wrath.
The board of Dansk Kulturfilm in autumn 1945 decided that their planned church film would exclusively be about village churches. Dreyer would rework the script that was written by editor and folk high-school principal Bernhard Jensen, aided by a committee of experts consisting of architect H. Lønborg-Jensen and Victor Hermansen, curator at the National Museum of Denmark. Dreyer had a first draft ready in mid-March, entitled Kirken er et gammelt Hus ("The Church Is an Old House"), which was distributed to the members of the committee for their comments.
In the last half of July, Dreyer and Victor Hermansen travelled the country to look at suitable churches. They researched the details and at Dreyer’s request a number of technical changes were made to the churches, including the removal of porcelain holders for electrical wiring in Tveje Merløse Church.
On 4 July, Dreyer went in advance to Ringkøbing. Shooting was set to start a few days later with the arrival of the director of photography, Preben Frank, who had fallen off a ladder and broken his leg, Fortunately, he was ready to cautiously start working again within a few days, with his leg in a cast.
Otherwise, the production went without a glitch. Everywhere, Dreyer said, they were well received at the vicarages and they had no problem getting enough extras. On 1 august, they returned to Copenhagen with almost all their footage in the can. They only needed to film the church in Skelby, where the weather had been against them, plus a Swedish wooden church in Hedared. The economy was distressed so soon after the war, especially when it came to foreign currency, but there were no real wooden churches left in Denmark and building an interior set in the studio would be too expensive.
The finished film was shown for the first time on 24 September 1947 to a small, closed circle, which included the Minister for Ecclesiastical Affairs. In December 1947, as was Dansk Kulturfilm’s standard practice, the film was presented to the press, politicians and others on a programme with four other short films.
印度新片，直面社会犯罪案件，情节几次大反转，虽然漏洞很多，还可看。
前面和中间都还可以，结尾太假了，幼儿园老师来帮调节这种国民级案件？？反方根本不会给你这种机会，其次证据也太假了，全靠一面之词。
没几分钟就让人头皮发麻的片子，哲理深沉的台词。
一开始觉得印度出的很多电影都是他们yy的，毕竟现状并没改变多少，但至少敢拍。种族歧视、媒体操纵等都提到了。最后说一句：全世界的zheng客都很贱
中国电影不仅在剧本讲故事的能力上，更在国家社会议题的反思和讨论上，离韩日以及印度电影差的越来越远了
能拍出这样的电影并且让其通过审核上映。我看到了他们的希望
首先，它有令人惊讶的反转，适当的带动情绪的BGM，引发观众思考的故事议题。
印度又一部批判体制的电影，敢于发声的电影，对于热点社会议题没有进行更深层次的探讨，好在讲故事的手法，角色的反转，还能吸引人看下去。前面半个小时的处理不太好，为了后面法庭戏的反转模糊了故事，又想调动大众情绪，总是情绪先于故事，很难让人共情。
用了这么长的时长还讲不好故事不是烂片是什么？豆瓣对印度片真是一贯的宽容，只要题材好，拍成什么烂样子都要捧上天，问就是别人敢拍，那直接看新闻不好？
震撼！！真震撼！！十分震撼！！！一个中国人看印度电影痛哭流涕感慨万千！不到三个小时的电影里包裹的信息量太大了，完全可以拍一个电视剧的量！好几段镜头反复观看！特别是前20分钟那位女学生带着其他同学来到甘地广场抗议，穿插了老师生前的授课真是看得我头皮发麻汗毛直立！前两年我对韩国电影刮目相看，这两年我又对印度电影刮目相看！在中国媒体的报道下印度脏乱差qj大国，但是为什么人家呈现出来的影视作品如此的高质量！再看看近几年国内电影除了抗战片我想起来的依旧是我不是药神！哎！哎！哎！
你以为的真相不是真相，你以为的正义可能不是正义，所以永远不要愤怒得太早。如果只有前半段，值3星，后半段一连串的反转和引发的思考让它值得5星。
后半段是跪着看完的。
2、媒体，你以为你很清醒，其实你还是被利用，被煽动，想起网络暴民
后半段的反转略精彩~结尾有些拖沓，不干脆~
电影题材是好的，但是大家没必要印吹和妄自菲薄
韩国以及印度的电影，为何敢于这么拍出黑暗，国内连拍都不敢吧，敢拍的导演演员肯定直接被封杀，几乎不可能过审，都让国民活在童话之中，感谢韩国印度拍的这种电影，让我们看清楚人性
作为观众前半段亲身体验了不知细节的民众多么容易被情感操纵，后半段庭述一句一个巴掌，打得你说不出话，现实中，政治从来没有对错良善之分，只有忠诚的政治，站队的政治。虽然铺满的BGM和无意义慢镜头太恼人，但真的就是忍不住的好羡慕啊
所以，这部阿三片看了十分钟，我以为又是探讨强奸问题的（毕竟，这已经是阿三们挥之不去的顽疾了）。看了一个小时，我以为是警察化身法外裁决者的爽片。但是，怎么可能？这部片子长达161分钟，一个小时过后，当我们以为了解了事情的来龙去脉的时候，后半段进入了精彩的法庭辩论，真相层层剥开，反转再反转，激荡人心的配乐，看得人心潮澎湃。短短161分钟的电影，涉及到了强奸、校园腐败、种姓制度、政治黑暗、媒体导向，也深刻的反省了法学理论中很重要的一个议题:实体正义和程序正义哪一个更重要？
有两次反转。刚开始看的时候想到了前段时间发生的唐山事件，当然这部电影不止于此。政治，教育，体制，法律，舆论，媒体，涉及的内容更多，以至于演员也多，对于脸盲患者来说有点困难。
怎么说呢，前半段节奏冗长且慢镜头铺音乐强煽情，后半段庭审的程序正义和结果正义的辩论作为引子刚调动起情绪后最终落脚点依旧还是印度自身的种姓制度和社会问题；可我转念一想，电影是作者自己的表达，而且影片反映出的难道又仅是印度独有的问题么，很多时候打高分还是电影以外的东西。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
