This was the first of the videos that started a trend of sex education videos in the early 1990s . I guess the idea behind it was for liberated women to go into a high street store and buy it without any type of guilt or inhibition , but no doubt the main buyer market was teenage boys and dirty old men
THE LOVERS GUIDE is groundbreaking in the fact that it publicised that the couples involved were real life partners but this is slightly dishonest , yes the main couple featured Wendy and her husband were indeed a real life couple who'd been married several years but there was some public controversy that at least one of the couples Kathryn ( The gorgeous brunette ) and Marino ( The well buffed geezer with a ponytail ) had never met one another until they appeared on set where they had unprotected sex for the camera . For a video that self righteously dedicates segments to safe sex it is rather hypocritical
Seeing as it's for education purposes and not pornography as such there's limits as to what can be shown but as a sex education video it's not uninformative though I doubt if you'll be gasping " I never knew that "
As a footnote the main couple featured became something of sexual problem agony aunts in the British press - Until it was revealed that Wendy's husband had a serious heart condition which put a stop to sex . I almost felt sorry for this couple who confessed that they used to make love as often as ten times a day but now couldn't make love once a day because it was too dangerous . My small amount of sympathy soon vanished when shortly afterwards the couple split up and raced off to the gutter press in order to dish the dirt on one another to the highest bidder .
印度的问题不只种姓制度这一方面，一两个案子治标不治本，电影只是代表一些觉醒，要想解决问题需要一个长期艰难的过程。还会有很多不为人知的被歧视被冤屈被虐待被杀害的人永远抱屈衔冤了。
故事剧本、音乐甚至于镜头都是印度电影标准啊。
类似于划分种姓造成的各种人权问题永远无法完全解决，能有人站出来帮助平衡就不错了。生命比金钱重要，名声比挨揍重要这些道理，有时候却是光脚的人更明白。
为弱者求正义加分了，有个迷思？为啥印度、韩国这种社会现实电影拍得很煽情、动容，但事实却进步很慢，相比于中国，是我们更看重实干而忽视了拍电影的叙事技巧吗？
选题十分有价值，拍摄技法娴熟，艺术性欠佳，有存在意义，但有碍于时代和文化，以及过于啰嗦的剧情，除了结尾部分外，观赏价值不高！
虽然这样说很狭隘，但每多看一部印度片，就越希望离那片可怕的土地远一点。是真的从心底发怵。
打着韩国《辩护人》的称号，自然增加了不少期待。得益于叙事的方式和节奏，三个小时的片长并不觉得冗长乏味。社会命题固然沉重，但整个庭审胜利和伟光正的主角，未免有些轻巧了。（3.5星）
非常工整的类型电影，类似的电影在印度屡见不鲜，先不说电影拍出来上映了能否影响社会，最起码是社会是允许拍摄及上映的，这估计是国人为什么疯狂打五颗星的理由。电影里又一句话挺对：你办案是掀裙子办吗？（对，我就是在说西安地铁撕人家女生衣服那事）。
完全没发觉这部片的时长哎！人类对故事的接受度永无止境
制作上其实不算很精良
打着韩国《辩护人》的称号，自然增加了不少期待。得益于叙事的方式和节奏，三个小时的片长并不觉得冗长乏味。社会命题固然沉重，但整个庭审胜利和伟光正的主角，未免有些轻巧了。（3.5星）
8.0。有个缺点就是片子太长。后半部分很燃。
前面很棒，后面拖拉，印度电影就是有一个老毛病，就喜欢把电影的篇幅拉这么长。
主角必须毫无污点么
主角必须毫无污点么
好片，不得不说印度还是敢拍的，种姓制度拖累了他们。
期待有朝一日聶樹斌案也能拍成電影，一定更加精彩感人！
这是真实事件改编吗？前半段真的太绝望了，钱德鲁正义之光。
为了正义，为了真相。很难想象要是没后台在印度这么伸张正义有多难。
#此片通过钱德鲁律师所打的拉贾坎努（Rajakannu）人权案，犀利、扎心地暴露了印度严重的种姓制度弊端，揭露了贪腐警方及当权者对低种姓部落民众凶残的暴行和对人权/法律的肆意践踏，与《熔炉》不同，此片让人欣慰的是～“既使在多刺的丛林里，也有鲜花”，虽历经限辛，正义最终没有缺席！#电影长达2小时40分钟，但故事紧凑、叙述清晰、张驰有度，颇吸引人。既便是针砭时弊的严谨社会片，也不乏印度片中常有的歌舞，但一点也不唐突违和。演员也都挺棒的。钱德鲁的一身正气、不怒自威在影片中有很好的展现。 #在现实世界，钱德鲁律师代表言论自由，反对米萨、塔达和波塔法案，他所处理的任何人权案件均未收过一个卢比，六年内他主持了96000起案件，作出了历史性的判决……并废除了低种姓的隔离制度。他是正义、法律和良心的化身，
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
