A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
和剧版比起来，各种程度上来说都不能算一部很好看的电影，一直在拖进度条，剧情感觉几个模块拼接起来情感过渡的也不流畅，可惜了那么好的人设，我永远喜欢西条高人！！
妈呀，虎牙+酒窝，我无法抵抗的相貌组合，我的审美g spot
电影整体还是挺流畅的。动作戏部分完成度较高。但是文戏部分实在太罗嗦太拖沓了。现在这个年代，像这种又臭又长的拍法，不可能还会有人喜欢看了。感情戏实在太老套了，早都是三十年前就淘汰的桥段。看的令人太烦了。总体值三颗星。我觉得很客观。小演员的表演很出色，是加分项。
會難過但是依然不講真話
人活着就是为了西条高人！！！！！！！我老婆真的是太好了！！！！！
比tv版水，但也还可以，下个饭，诶呀这种感情真好，太激情了。另外就是说全世界都会说日语呗，（日语口音的西班牙语、？
18岁的乔安娜有注意缺陷多动障碍（ADHD），在她的脑海中，思绪就像旺季的游乐园一样旋转着。父亲患上抑郁症后，他的病假工资只能勉强支付房租，再也负担不起她的药物治疗。为
这部电影给了我很大的惊喜，所以要鼓励。我们拍电影的初心是什么，拍电影可不可以走点心，我们的要求真的高吗，这些问题是不是应该多想一想，至少你要对得起自己呀！
导演的转场技术很高超 片子瑞典风格很浓（也可能是导演个人风格 我不知道）挺细腻的，是一种很明显的细腻
must be old. 为这类青少年爱情落泪已经很久不是我的风格了，但，，，大概就是这样吧，剧情流畅，人设饱满，主人公很糟糕很
网大的水平里还行
音乐巨他妈好听。青少年的爱情故事，放在成年人世界都不是什么过不去的坎儿，但好在真诚。
在这个浪漫的西班牙国度，到处是热烈的弗拉明哥舞者，东谷准太和西条高人，进一步明确了内心所向。“我曾经是个空壳，不知从何时起，我觉得自己没有能跟世界交流的心灵，但并不是这样的，我也确实有能令我内心产生波动的事物，世界是如此鲜明，有一个人，一瞬间教会了我这件事，还有爱上一个人，竟会变得如此脆弱，我害怕失去。”“为了今后永远一起生活下去，我们不能永远待在一起，但是我绝对会回到你身边，而你也要回来，因为我也变得脆弱了。”爱让人如此脆弱，那也肯定是，为了跟这份温暖一起活下去，而生的脆弱。
粗话风的片名，是赞叹，也是赞美。它是在片尾处的台词，有一种让人潸然泪下的魔力。
制作肯定要好于tv版，这是可以说的吧，这个一眼看到结局的故事本身并没有什么嚼头。
喜欢！终于看到了！这种故事就是只要不出大的观念问题，叙事又流畅，我真的会夸夸！以来到准太的家乡学习弗朗明哥舞作为线索，讲述西条高人逐渐认知到自己对准太的爱还有学习如何直接地表达，真的很适合傲娇系的他！这个故事线清晰明了很喜欢！还有准太这边视角的补充，关于亚克力板的镜头很喜欢！
最后拿平底锅硬刚，真是戏剧化了。不被资本控制，就想赢得胜利的配角，很有体育精神。
但优点也是突出的，值得一说，睡个觉起来再写长文吧。
『为了我们能永远不变的在一起，我非得有所改变不可』
儿子是个好儿子，爹可能只是个儿子心中的好爹。哪怕亲妈再有钱，男孩果然还是喜欢一个能带自己打游戏的爹。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
