Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
前1个小时挺好的 涉及到南北问题就绷不住了
毕竟是一个刚出乡村的毛头小子，你不能奢望他有多么坚定的信念和睿智的思维……
当一个老师说出学生最大的任务就是理解考官意图的时候，无疑是整个教育体系的失败。韩国如此，中国如此。韩国编剧真的有些东西，上一次看到用数学谈恋爱，这一次用数学弹钢琴。本文科生被迷得五迷三道的。
前1个小时挺好的 涉及到南北问题就绷不住了
《毛骗 第一季》↗《毛骗 第二季》↗《毛骗 终结篇》（个人观感逐步提升）↘《城市的边缘》↘《杀不死》↘《非常保镖》→《冤家宜解不宜结》（个人好感逐渐下降）。附注：你们竟敢在戏里打导演邢冬冬，不怕戏份被剪？好吧，后面被导演给揍了吧？
就是个农民工被拐骗到黑工厂打工，反抗无能，最后同流合污的故事，对于人性多角度内心选择刻画的还是不错的，论扫黑除恶的重要性！
巴西警察好爱塑料袋子啊😂电影好残酷啊，马图斯头尾两次坐在车里审视圣保罗，从一开始的开阔大楼到后期高耸的电线，这大牢笼是体制性的腐化，一己之力确实不够
题材蛮好的，朝鲜数学家，忘年之交，但是总感觉有点落俗了，剧情也过于平淡，没有什么吸引人的点！
有点闷，谁都是囚徒，想走出牢笼反抗的方式各有不同。
崔岷植老师演艺生涯过一天少一天了，答应大家少接点这种片子好嘛
从受害者爬升到施害者的行列，现实感十足。经济衰退的背景下，很多陈旧落后的元素卷土重来。主角聪明细心有主意，但也依靠危机四伏中的偶发好运。没有执着于某种固定的“剧情线”，加重了现实环境的危机和不确定感。
挨饿还是做恶？
柏林墙倒掉三十多年了，三八线犹自兀立，人类何时能停止纷争？
有点闷，谁都是囚徒，想走出牢笼反抗的方式各有不同。
看，那就是你们的工作为这座城市做的贡献！奴隶主义是帝国主义的最高阶段。
ᐈ我可以提高工作效率，我们不会再惹事了，我可以为你赚更多的钱
老戏骨风范依旧。
崔岷植怎么会接演这种剧本呢？
只有好电影才会让你越来越爱看电影。什么是好电影？那一定是讲人性的。这部电影展现的恶让你有共鸣，时时抓住你的感官，看这样的电影才会不觉得一两个小时很漫长。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
