Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
加菲太适合扮演这个角色，演技好、与原型像。
2比1有趣诶，看着看着发现老夫人是真的要去世了，提到马修猝不及防但是，马修真的是玛丽唯一真爱吧。再拍就又要打仗了，应该不会再拍了吧。看到最后的葬礼，一下子想起看唐顿故事有十几年了诶，故事中的新时代真的开启了，故事外的观众也能接受结局了。
In my potion of view, this is the best film of 2021. If you're nearly thirty and still in a hard time chasing your dream. This film could give you some inspiration.
Jon的第一场试片会结束后，好评如潮但无人投资，他问经纪人“那我现在该怎么办？”，经纪人说“写下一部，写完了就再写一部，一直投稿直到有回应为止，这是大多数剧作家的宿命。”有才华的人终将被看到，需要的是时间和耐心。只不过除了这段，全片剧情和音乐都不怎么打动人，不及影片最后Jonathan Larson本人的影像有感染力。
唐顿庄园里面最灵魂的人物落幕了，我也是实在不希望再续拍下去了
一星扣在歌曲质量，歌舞片的舞蹈和音乐上不去是硬伤。任何艺术家总会有一段至暗时刻，艺术梦想是生活里唯一的慰藉，如灯塔或明星般遥不可及却闪闪发亮，把这些辛酸酿成美酒是多么痛苦又珍贵的过程。生活中的臭水沟太多，大部分里都没有月亮。有人选择妥协，而有人选择自己成为那轮月亮。
看完满是心满意足的喜欢～仍然小中见大的剧本，电影版上一部已经很惊喜了这部还要更好，A New Era是立意更高版的《雨中曲》、又是老太太乃至庄园乃至整个英国的变化。多引进些这样的片子多好
婚礼开头葬礼结尾，真希望唐顿永远不要end
如果说Company是30岁群体的情感焦虑，TTB则像要补足他们的职业焦虑——在我看来他们来自于同一类人。必须要赞叹LMM的导演处女秀，把这部作品做音乐电影其实很容易变成煽情MV，但是ONE MAN SHOW式的旁白穿插，起到了一定的调和作用，最终也可以哀而不伤。若说不足可能是前边有点细碎，后半程更流畅情绪也更浓烈，整体有点过盛。加菲和演员们的在线不多吹了，SUNDAY的大合唱很有百老汇重聚的感动。最终最终一定要说每吹Jonathan Larson或者LMM都会感叹桑爷是永远的神，我相信他们所做也是为了证明自己的偶像足够伟大，一切成就皆是向光的结果。
“一瞬间你就死了，一瞬间你就过时了”sad😥and you might have to keep on writing and writing until......
超保守价值观🥵+二流电视剧拍摄手法......急需补一部肯洛奇
歌舞都很好很精美但美中不足不够打动人心，从电影角度来看人物塑造不够立体。但歌舞片就是要有歌舞片的样子，有加菲又唱又跳还要什么自行车。
只有电影院才能让细微的情感放大到无数倍😭😭😭
我们总也无法打败时间，我们永远逃不脱这时代，但我们仍拥有些感动，这感动永存，对吗？
赢了表演，输了情感。歌舞编排强是强，大多时间都是舞台与现实来回转换的优秀演出。 但本片跟“下限高，上限低”的万金油作品有什么实质差别吗？当然没差别，故事模板，影像表达，又亦是情绪渲染都被主创方和资本彻底锁死。 也基本跟电影里的人物所说，“引人入胜，却难以让观众跟随故事的情感主线，太多细节让我们分心，也同样难以产生共鸣。” 所以第三幕的高潮与其说是佳章倒不如说是正常发挥，毕竟［倒数时刻］本就未真正存在过，一部精彩却又扁平无奇的传记片。
始于婚礼 终于葬礼 时代远去 让我安静的死去
我也喜欢被爱引导，so why not five⭐
林聚聚导演的第一部电影长片，能为自己的偶像拍这样一部电影，让更多人了解他、记住他，一定是一件很幸福的事情。
精神唐顿家人。甚至比1还好。南法别墅和庄园电影双线，没想到的剧情安排。还是一如既往地哭着笑着看完全剧，完全忘了身在何处，觉得剧中人就是现在的身边的而不是一百年前的，每一个人物的悲喜都强烈共鸣。
Movie of the year. A blessing for any theatre/musical lover or idealist. Story about 90s, Broadway, New York, creativity, love, fear, time, and life. Don’t mind Lin’s rusty directing, the emotions are so raw. R.I.P. Stephen Sondheim, who passed away just after the release of this film. We all have, and will always have a song unsung.
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
