Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
东出昌大神烦，鲁邦的女婿也hold不大住。意外的是成田优的演技亦正亦邪。
几年一度的日影爱好者狂欢。请继续拍，一直拍。只要里面的熟脸们还在营业，我的青春就好像还没散场。
东出比起两年前真的丑了好多，这就是出轨的福报吗
可以了，不要再拍了。感觉又费钱又不好看，套路都一样，不能玩个别的IP吗？还有，尽量不要让我看到东出的脸了，谢谢。
反转虽好猜，却过瘾。赤星已经彻底沦为达子的粉丝。ツチノコ这老师傅的设定有点乱啊，算是给主角三人相遇补充一个契机吧
其实剧情都能猜到 但为了活在台词里的Star加一星 故事里的他们还记得她 真好
熟悉的套路、没有意外的反转、全员皆演员，但我还是愿意为达子买单！
5）一看安达工作不像话的样子 冒火
我唯一想吐槽的事是 貌似日本选演员特别挑角度和表情...尤其不能笑...下海拍耽美的完颜男演员简直是万里挑一...
前面太难看了😅而且前两条线展开后就太好猜了…既然把答案解释出来了为啥又回去讲一遍过程？立意嘛，心灵鸡汤水平。消遣品算不上了都。啊，最后固定节目舞台表演加到五星（误
在套路用尽的情况下，还能够反转得如此彻底，可谓是编剧之功。主角团也将颜艺化的表演贯彻到底，放飞的氛围以至于常常能让人忽略逻辑的脱链和情节的粗疏。
反正套路还是那个套路，最后反转还是接着反转，在这几部里面算一般的吧。
情怀+1 说到洁西和star的时候 眼眶都不争气的红了，这个ip能搞这么多部下来制作也不算拉垮实属不易了，期待下一部吧，许愿一个阿部宽，以及把生濑胜久从彩蛋里放出来啦！！
最后的masami好可爱
贺岁档，每年都看一乐呵也挺不错的。丰叔真的真的太可爱了！蓝眼人有点尬就是了。
このパタンにはもう飽きた……まちゃん相変わらず可愛すぎるのに。これって，東出君のラストフイルムじゃん？
日腐高质量佳作，感觉是开启了日腐新纪元的感觉，之后不断涌现和之前不同风格好作品。
先表白一波长泽女士 她用绝对的个人魅力撑起了这个系列 就连她的嘴角纹和法令纹在我眼里都那么真实可爱 大制作下满意的是各种小细节和引申 痛哭着说要洗心革面的东出 杰西(春马)去旅行了 诈欺剧情看太多了全在意料之中
剧情蛮单薄的，但是看互动看脸看氛围也算可以一看
赤星：一天不被达子骗，难受一天。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
