Totally unawares, Saverio, a teacher and Mario, a janitor of the same school in which they both work, travel back in time and find themselves in central Italy at the end of the 15th century. They carry with them an unresolved squabble concerning Saverio’s sister, creating a lot of tension between the two, which will increase in the plot. From this moment on they will have to come to grips with the grotesque situation they find themselves in, trying to "hitch a lift" back to the future in a most outlandish way, using and misusing their foresight of the events taking place round that time, and generally making fools of themselves in the eyes of "normal" renaissance folks. Their meeting with Leonardo da Vinci is hysterical, when they become more and more convinced that the genius is in reality a moron. Another character they meet is Savonarola the heretic, who enjoins them to repent, before he is taken to the stake, eliciting some breezy comment from them. If it weren’t for a weird kind of homesickness, they would quite enjoy living in this period, full of daring fashions and tantalising damsels.
The couple shows great chemistry and is funny in every respect. The psychology of their characters is complex and credible - for once comical roles with a depth. Basically, Saverio is an embittered petit-bourgeois forever attracted and rejected by women, envious of Mario, an easy-going proletarian every woman falls in love with. Saverio is scheming, mean and vindictive as much as Mario is naive, generous and forgiving. What a match of talents: Roberto Benigni and Massimo Troisi at the peak of combined creativity. Too bad they will never come back together for another joint venture. Or maybe it is better this way: masterpieces of this level cannot be improved on, at best they can be imitated. For this reason Non ci resta che piangere will shine like a gem in the crown of the best Italian movies of all times. Sadly not many people seem to have seen it, not even in Italy, where the viewers do not need subtitles to enjoy the hilarious juggling of the two actors with the language, but their body language can be universally appreciated.
If you miss it you will have to repent!
最近被深深依赖的公司辞退了，究其原因还是自己太软弱。
节奏一般，剧情可预见，最后一段讲话太low了。顺带评一下豆瓣没有的夜叉：3星，yy的有点严重啊，在大沈阳那样打打杀杀还能全身而退？但看着挺爽的。这次两大影帝剧本选的都一般
最后果然还是没有和群众站在一起。路都是自己选的，可以选择自己过的不好，也可以选择深渊，但深渊迟早会被填平——如果在一个大多数人都在受苦的环境下，你过得好本身就是有罪的。
故事编得有点随意了，有几个地方甚至觉得离谱了。
加入南北背景的韩国版垫底辣弟（？）+爆米花版万物理论，但崔岷植的演技和成熟的韩影商业电影叙事手法让整部片有了一定的厚度。台词写得很好，节奏流畅的，结局温暖。
尽管拍得套路，但现实这么糟糕，谁不会被这个温暖又美好的故事感动呢，可能最近情绪也不太好，看得我眼泪哗哗。演员选得真好，新人特别可爱，崔岷植一出来我就不行了，永远可以相信崔岷植的表演，永远。
我一直认为，世界上只有一种英雄主义，那就是打不过就加入。很高兴终于看到一部与我观点相同的电影
故事结构能联想到闻香识女人，剧情和故事套路一般，缺少动人心弦的震撼感，情节编排和逻辑有点突兀，交代不清。如果没有影帝的演技支撑话，恐怕还拿不到这个分。
潜逃至韩国的朝鲜数学家隐名埋姓在一个高中校园做保安，如何辅导一名高中生的故事，最后不得已出面为高中生作证。硬生生的把一个剧情插入了政治因素，再透露了韩国教育的某些阴暗面。
如果不考虑政治因素，这片子前1个小时可以看，后面基本上属于狗尾续貂，愣是要升华主题，但实际矛盾和高潮已经错过，1个小时候就会显得很尴尬。但如果加上政治因素……你就看这个名字，就知道棒子们想干啥了
看手机，是近年背景的，巴西仍存在奴隶式强制劳动？美国能编出新j的事还成堆欧美人信也许因为它们那真司空见惯了，类似埃及几千年来的奴隶制，他们的传统艺能了
评分这么低？这是我22年第一季度以来看过的最佳电影。
崔老师真是神级影帝，撑起了一整部戏，其实剧本不咋地。小演员也不在线
角色的转变就是这么自然，所以不要相信小地方的人当了官会为小地方的人谋福利，可能压榨的更恶劣。
崔叔五官特别是眼睛像小鹿一样，温和慈祥。
以演讲来撑起全片高潮还是略显单薄了。比较平庸的一部。
前1个小时挺好的 涉及到南北问题就绷不住了
7分，贩卖劳工版斯德哥尔摩综合症的写实呈现。导演挺善于反套路，每当观众按惯性需求渴望产生戏剧冲突的点，往往戛然而止，却以构建细节来刻画心理变迁的历程。从觉醒、愤怒、谋划、失败，到求和、寻机、入套、妥协乃至同化，把棍棒+蜜糖的常见洗脑套路编排的游刃有余，顺其自然一步步走向黑化。
我好希望它能在“数学”上再多花点胶片，去充分展示数学的魅力，因为作为基础学科，它往往被文科省视作险峰，如果电影可以跳出“考试成绩”的范围，更加生动的来阐述数学的魅力，激发学习的兴趣，那该多好啊！
社会就是弱肉强食。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
