这是Richard Lester最好的一个片。
An absurdist classic
This is a wonderful surreal comedy based on the play by Spike Milligan and John Antrobus. You know that it is going to be an odd film right at the beginning, when the opening credits list the cast in order of their height. The film begins with the BBC (Frank Thornton) telling us through the facade of an old television that this is the third, or is it the fourth?, anniversary of the shortest war in history, lasting 2 hours and 28 minutes. England is now a barren landscape, littered with derelict cars and buildings, hills of old boots, broken crockery, and other debris. Forty million people perished and there are only 20 known survivors. The Queen did not survive, and of the 20 known survivors the next in line for the throne is a Mrs Ethel Schroake of 393a High Street, Leytonstone. Among the other survivors are Ralph Richardson (O Lucky Man!) as Lord Fortnum of Alamein, who isn't looking forward to his impending mutation into a bed sitting room. Michael Hordern is Bules Martin, who wears a 18-carat Hovis bread ring. Spike Milligan is a postman who wanders around and delivers some memorable dialogue, for example: "And in come the three bears - the daddy bear said, 'Who's been sleeping in my porridge?' - and the mummy bear said, 'that's no porridge, that was my wife' ". Arthur Lowe is slowly turning into a parrot (which is then eaten by Spike Milligan), while his wife, the owner of her own death certificate, turns into a wardrobe. His daughter is pregnant with a strange creature, which she has held inside her for seventeen months. Peter Cook and Dudley Moore are a pair of policemen who perpetually tell the others to "keep moving!". Moore growls a lot and turns into a dog at the end. Marty Feldman is a wellington-boot-wearing nurse. It's a hilarious, absurdist treat, and one of my treasured filmic pleasures.
以时间为顺序，串联起捍卫疆土、自强不息、市场发展、科技未来四篇，将“父辈”这一延续性的概念直通当下与未来。演员转型导演，暴露出导演功力的欠缺，但比较聪明的是能以优势藏拙。吴京篇是“父辈的抉择”，动作场面血性十足、调度成熟，父子生死为悬念反转，不过文戏方面铺垫反转的目的性太强。章子怡篇是“父辈的牺牲”，结尾诗篇升华将离场感提升一个档次，但是堆砌情境、滥用闪回、人物转变依靠口述暴露了剧本推进动力的不足。徐峥篇是“父辈的创造”，是最为轻盈流畅的篇章。但是风格化的包装停留在表面，人物和剧作停留在舒适区里，赶工痕迹明显，“小聪明”过多。沈腾篇结尾点题是有巧思的，有继承也有回望。笑点令人发笑，但是整体太过琐碎拼凑，喜剧人欢聚一堂也只是过场，没有能够立得住的人物。
《乘风》对标《亮剑》，骑兵连连长再次冲锋时，一下子将人带回当年亮剑骑兵冲锋那一段，每次看那一段都是热泪盈眶。
在片尾听到王菲唱的每一句词才能真的理解父辈的伟大
相对于家乡还是感觉稍逊一筹。可能是时代的原因，更喜欢后两个故事，尤其沈腾那个，就是不理解仿生机器人已经那么强了，为啥还怕水？最基础的技术竟然没解决。总让我出戏。应该是编剧想不出一个不怕水去创造剧情高潮的那个点了吧。
后两个真的都很拉，《乘风》与一众抗战主旋律毫无二致，如果说这个片段是《长津湖》里面的大概所有人都相信吧，拍摄手法和水平几乎可以忽略不计。《少年行》就是一个笑话（双层含义上的。
吴京真的是一个特别好的战争片导演，运镜，氛围感都拿捏熟练，杀死日本鬼子指挥官时由上往下的视角犹如新中国藐视着日本帝国主义的侵略，不可侵犯。最后的人马合一的马儿扬蹄镜头更给了人振奋向前，展望新中国的无限可能
《诗》和《鸭先知》还行，但是也只是在这里面对比起来还行。因为吴京那个根本看不下去。
不过分煽情会好些，沈•钢铁之心•腾，玩尬的可还行？！
乘风：以革命为历史坐标，从骑兵的小视角切入，家国情怀投射在了一对军人父子身上。吴京早已对军事题材游刃有余，但在命题作文内还是显得杂乱无章，长枪冲大炮是什么鬼
徐峥部分最完整，章娘娘好于预期，吴京部分感觉不太完整，完全可以拍成一部长片的故事，沈腾部分有些过于抓马，科幻部分有没有好像无所谓。
为了自由
吴京的段落剧情有点乱，以及张天爱挺不适合这种正剧角色的。最喜欢徐峥的part。
又一次的短片合集。国庆的这每一次宛如是一次各大导演的命题作文试炼场
整体看来三部曲一直在进步，不过沈腾这part没有去年《神笔马亮》惊艳。
实在是，不能理解为什么骑兵团要背着枪举刀。。。还要欧式决斗式干死了，有点，实在是看不下去了。。。
才看完。还挺矫情的。另外都说章子怡那部拍得最好，但我觉得还是过于矫情了，而且章子怡给自己过多的作为演员的表现空间了。另外她演那种工人角色也不合适，跟工种和周围环境的人相比过于突出太违和。为啥片子刚出来的时候到处都是一顿夸。。。最好的明明还是徐峥那个章节。。。
(7+)除了吴京的第一部分以外都还不错，徐峥的鸭先知高于预期，寓教于乐大法好，2019-2021国庆三部曲，分别标记了两星三星四星，也是一件很有意思的事情
这种拼盘应该坚持不了多久，但又怕这种拼盘真被坚持很久。
徐峥的片段值得四星鼓励，沈腾的片段三星吧后面挺感动的。
比较惊艳的是洋子老师很暖，片尾曲很好听
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
