Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
剧情又烂又老套，但是lily真的美得太过分，安娜都失色不少…立马去关注了一波ins发现王校长也关注了她
因为部分镜头的不可描述而小小满足…
女主太美！只会装傻笑~装笑里藏刀~可是，不太够。算了，全片都是真空，又是露大腿。又是露啥的，还想咋的[害羞][害羞][害羞] 这部片讲演技，真的应该女1，2调个会好很多。当然，本片剧情也是不咋地，本来也快完了，又搞一个不记名债券，然后男2就这么嗝了，最夸张是，小孩单手居然拿得住手枪把女主干了，算了算了，看妹子就好了。
智能家居安防广告片？
6.0非常勉强及格吧，主要是这个剧情没什么好说的，非常垃圾，有些镜头好像点样。我也不懂要表达什么，那么好看的女主卖肉也没有，如果这部片会飙到5分以下，那就是我的鉴赏能力有问题了，我真的认为勉勉强强及格吧
情节一塌糊涂，但至少养眼。朴素的道理也不少，例如： 不露富是有道理的，小心驶得万年船。不是所有萍水相逢都如表面般美好。放交响乐的房子真不错。
剧情设置极其不合理。男主被设定得简直智商还不如德牧。
基本是女主的独角戏分，队员们牺牲的都莫名其妙，动作戏份有点少……
初中习作水平的剧本和台词，演技拉跨的男女主，却能请来大牌影星配戏。莫非这片是娃娃脸女主的某个俄罗斯糖爹投的？
背景设定没有很好的交代清楚，看了介绍才知道是末日后世界。冰天雪地也只有北欧那边才有的情景，最后病毒炸了，会不会扩散啊
太不禁推敲了，女主很漂亮，但是演技实在不能恭维。除了会笑，没有演技。
老套的仙人跳情节，女主角实在太漂亮，莉莉·库拉格，多打一颗星。
我其实比较怀疑导演和N社的大数据专家，谁负责电影内容的搭建。现实世界中，生物武器不能成为一锤定音的武器，它只能成为不人道的摧毁经济的武器。据我所知，生物武器最近一次使用，大概是美国给叙利亚送带病的种子… 疾病武器的杀伤在任何情况下，都是有限的。封城，是解决一切问题的总纲。
作呕 如果不是结局反杀 我真的觉得就是一部鼓励犯罪的片子 ⚠单身精英们 大家别幻想着什么转角遇真爱 都只是操控人性 也千万千万不要跟底层社会的人接触 不管他哪里吸引你 因为你永远不会知道他的道德下限行为极限 最后他留给你的绝对只有血淋淋的教训
“仙人跳”的老套故事。但是，Lily Krug，这个新人小妞也太漂亮了吧，而且还很敢演！给3星全因为她了。😍
开阔的视野，主角都开了挂一样没被直升机扫射打中……最大的硬伤就是：女主脑回路有问题。
月夜冰原滑行幾百海里，是個特別浪漫和獨特的場景，只是本片的搭配裡沒有源頭，又欠缺了收尾。
论冰雪运动在军事行动中的应用 北欧人民是不是和平的太久对战争的认知还停留在二战
“仙人跳”的老套故事。但是，Lily Krug，这个新人小妞也太漂亮了吧，而且还很敢演！给3星全因为她了。😍
玩过《地铁2033》的，对这种末世的冰封场景会有亲切感吧，时不时拷问一下人性，也像是在致敬这部巨作。如果没玩过《地铁2033》，看这电影也就一般，只有玩过了，才觉得有这电影，真不容易 。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
