Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
一般般吧，加戏加太多了，不利消化，包括波洛的过去和感情戏以及lgbt等政治正确情节……这样看来汉莫兄演技还是可以的，渣男假哭的度把握得刚刚好。演员么，火吻演不出贪财气质啊，加朵也不行，随便看看吧
3.电影关于埃及的风景描述不错
加了很多外加因素，削弱了故事主线，没有上一部《东方快车谋杀案》专注故事，还是阿加莎原著精彩。
你别说，嚯，谢苗的动作和一言一行在这部剧里还挺潇洒的。
人物关系设置不合理，出场人物虽然众多但大多纯粹仅为布景板而已，悬疑的表现手法也拙劣，根本不自然，全都是倒叙，观众们又不是三岁小孩……
在网剧里还算不错的，尤其看到小童星长成大人了，有点意外。故事比较平铺直叙，打斗戏还是比较货真价实的，+一星给点鼓励。
洛哈特教授内味儿的波罗侦探就算了吧……别人都没什么看头，就杰奎琳不错，疯批美人，长得还蛮像小丑女的
华纳你是年终预算没花完，撒钱找导演拍烂片，赶纳税申报吗
锤子是个不成功的花瓶
1.电影演到丢失了红颜料就大致猜到凶手了。
还行，除了黑恶浮夸点，剧情简短的，动作很精彩。属于质量高的网大。
满满正能量，打斗很真实，动作很精彩，扫黑除恶势在必行、大快人心、务尽！加一星鼓励。
哪怕看过原作，看过老版，我也依旧会为这桩谋杀的精妙设计而感到讶然，然而影片里，这种“精妙的设计”被快餐式地飞速呈上，俨然丧失了其本身让人抚掌，恍然的原意。
肯尼斯提名奥斯卡是真的水。
有个问题，这戏里面无一讨好的角色。这不不是死亡邮轮吗。12/100
em………中规中矩，节奏有点怪，揭秘过程太草率还一惊一乍的，不喜欢
肯尼斯没事做可以去搞原创IP，大可不必在这霍霍阿婆，虽然不是原著党，但总觉得要对原著有尊敬吧。这寄吧改得什么啊。
这玩意原著粉给两星就算给面子了，三星是我抛开原著给的，抛开原著勉强能看。导演别给波洛加戏了，你真想表现自己你就写原创剧本，别糟蹋阿加莎了谢谢。
故事支离破碎 角色莫名其妙 改编负面教材 收手吧阿肯
看过旧版也看过书，但印象真的不深了，一边看着一边回忆起来。虽然侦查过程确实弱了，波洛的性格形象也被大大改动，但是拍得太美了，整个色调与构图美得让我毫无抵抗力。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
